Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interactive Car-Following: Matters but NOT Always

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.16127 v1 pith:KRXOCI77 submitted 2023-07-30 cs.RO

Interactive Car-Following: Matters but NOT Always

classification cs.RO
keywords vehiclealwayscar-followingcontrolleadinginteractioninteractivefollowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Following a leading vehicle is a daily but challenging task because it requires adapting to various traffic conditions and the leading vehicle's behaviors. However, the question `Does the following vehicle always actively react to the leading vehicle?' remains open. To seek the answer, we propose a novel metric to quantify the interaction intensity within the car-following pairs. The quantified interaction intensity enables us to recognize interactive and non-interactive car-following scenarios and derive corresponding policies for each scenario. Then, we develop an interaction-aware switching control framework with interactive and non-interactive policies, achieving a human-level car-following performance. The extensive simulations demonstrate that our interaction-aware switching control framework achieves improved control performance and data efficiency compared to the unified control strategies. Moreover, the experimental results reveal that human drivers would not always keep reacting to their leading vehicle but occasionally take safety-critical or intentional actions -- interaction matters but not always.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.