Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Distractor generation for multiple-choice questions with predictive prompting and large language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.16338 v1 pith:G6NWYNGF submitted 2023-07-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords chatgptdistractorsgeneratingllmsexampleshigh-qualitylanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks and have garnered significant attention from both researchers and practitioners. However, in an educational context, we still observe a performance gap in generating distractors -- i.e., plausible yet incorrect answers -- with LLMs for multiple-choice questions (MCQs). In this study, we propose a strategy for guiding LLMs such as ChatGPT, in generating relevant distractors by prompting them with question items automatically retrieved from a question bank as well-chosen in-context examples. We evaluate our LLM-based solutions using a quantitative assessment on an existing test set, as well as through quality annotations by human experts, i.e., teachers. We found that on average 53% of the generated distractors presented to the teachers were rated as high-quality, i.e., suitable for immediate use as is, outperforming the state-of-the-art model. We also show the gains of our approach 1 in generating high-quality distractors by comparing it with a zero-shot ChatGPT and a few-shot ChatGPT prompted with static examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking the Pedagogical Knowledge of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors release an open benchmark of 1,143 pedagogical knowledge questions from Chilean teacher exams and report accuracy, cost, and size trade-offs for 97 large language models.

Pith tools