Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Pre-Trained Large Language Models for Industrial Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03028 v1 pith:GS35RLPZ submitted 2023-08-06 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords controlgpt-4hvacmodelsfoundationindustrialcontrollerdebt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For industrial control, developing high-performance controllers with few samples and low technical debt is appealing. Foundation models, possessing rich prior knowledge obtained from pre-training with Internet-scale corpus, have the potential to be a good controller with proper prompts. In this paper, we take HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) building control as an example to examine the ability of GPT-4 (one of the first-tier foundation models) as the controller. To control HVAC, we wrap the task as a language game by providing text including a short description for the task, several selected demonstrations, and the current observation to GPT-4 on each step and execute the actions responded by GPT-4. We conduct series of experiments to answer the following questions: 1)~How well can GPT-4 control HVAC? 2)~How well can GPT-4 generalize to different scenarios for HVAC control? 3) How different parts of the text context affect the performance? In general, we found GPT-4 achieves the performance comparable to RL methods with few samples and low technical debt, indicating the potential of directly applying foundation models to industrial control tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 8 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Exact Action Values Are Not Enough: Rollout-Verified Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of a Reasoning Model for Multi-Zone VAV Control

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Exact rollout-based action scores did not improve an open-weight LLM controller on a VAV HVAC simulator because the model lacked action-to-next-state prediction knowledge.

  2. Using Large Language Models for Parametric Shape Optimization

    cs.CE 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven evolutionary search, LLM-PSO, finds near-optimal airfoil and Stokes-flow body shapes on two benchmarks, generally converging faster than classical optimizers.

  3. Foundation Models for CPS-IoT: Opportunities and Challenges

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Current foundation models fall short on CPS-IoT needs in resource efficiency, spatial generalization, long-term context, and knowledge integration; the paper proposes desiderata and a community roadmap.

  4. Agentic LLMs in the Supply Chain: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Consensus-Seeking

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM-powered agents that negotiate with neighboring echelons reduce bullwhip and costs in a simulated supply chain, but the results rest on single runs and manually tuned prompts.

Pith tools