Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Feature Importance versus Feature Influence and What It Signifies for Explainable AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03589 v1 pith:NBT3EMNU submitted 2023-08-07 cs.AI cs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.HC
keywords featureimportanceinfluenceutilitycontextualexplanationsoutcomevalue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When used in the context of decision theory, feature importance expresses how much changing the value of a feature can change the model outcome (or the utility of the outcome), compared to other features. Feature importance should not be confused with the feature influence used by most state-of-the-art post-hoc Explainable AI methods. Contrary to feature importance, feature influence is measured against a reference level or baseline. The Contextual Importance and Utility (CIU) method provides a unified definition of global and local feature importance that is applicable also for post-hoc explanations, where the value utility concept provides instance-level assessment of how favorable or not a feature value is for the outcome. The paper shows how CIU can be applied to both global and local explainability, assesses the fidelity and stability of different methods, and shows how explanations that use contextual importance and contextual utility can provide more expressive and flexible explanations than when using influence only.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Visual Error Patterns in Multi-Modal AI: A Statistical Approach

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A gradient boosting model predicts GPT-4o visual classification errors on 75 geometric stimuli with AUC 0.85, with 3D and Pentagon features dominating.

Pith tools