REVIEW 1 cited by
CiFHER: A Chiplet-Based FHE Accelerator with a Resizable Structure
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is in the spotlight as a definitive solution for privacy, but the high computational overhead of FHE poses a challenge to its practical adoption. Although prior studies have attempted to design ASIC accelerators to mitigate the overhead, their designs require excessive chip resources (e.g., areas) to contain and process massive data for FHE operations. We propose CiFHER, a chiplet-based FHE accelerator with a resizable structure, to tackle the challenge with a cost-effective multi-chip module (MCM) design. First, we devise a flexible core architecture whose configuration is adjustable to conform to the global organization of chiplets and design constraints. Its distinctive feature is a composable functional unit providing varying computational throughput for the number-theoretic transform, the most dominant function in FHE. Then, we establish generalized data mapping methodologies to minimize the interconnect overhead when organizing the chips into the MCM package in a tiled manner, which becomes a significant bottleneck due to the packaging constraints. This study demonstrates that a CiFHER package composed of a number of compact chiplets provides performance comparable to state-of-the-art monolithic ASIC accelerators while significantly reducing the package-wide power consumption and manufacturing cost.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PlaceIT: Placement-based Inter-Chiplet Interconnect Topologies
Jointly optimizing chiplet placement and inter-chiplet topology reduces ICI latency by up to 62% for cache-coherent traffic versus a 2D mesh baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.