Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparison of Classical and Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods for HVAC Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.05711 v1 pith:3WDSBOP2 submitted 2023-08-10 cs.LG cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords hvacclassicalcontroldeeplearningmethodsreinforcementacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising approach for optimizing HVAC control. RL offers a framework for improving system performance, reducing energy consumption, and enhancing cost efficiency. We benchmark two popular classical and deep RL methods (Q-Learning and Deep-Q-Networks) across multiple HVAC environments and explore the practical consideration of model hyper-parameter selection and reward tuning. The findings provide insight for configuring RL agents in HVAC systems, promoting energy-efficient and cost-effective operation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SINERGYM -- A virtual testbed for building energy optimization with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sinergym is an open-source, Gymnasium-compatible virtual testbed that standardizes building energy optimization experiments with 87 preconfigured environments, weather variability, and experiment tracking.

Pith tools