Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.07106 v2 pith:VWENAG4L submitted 2023-08-14 cs.CV cs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords checklistobjecttestsareasaspectsautomateddefinedetections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The object perception of automated driving systems must pass quality and robustness tests before a safe deployment. Such tests typically identify true positive (TP), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) detections and aggregate them to metrics. Since the literature seems to be lacking a comprehensive way to define the identification of TPs/FPs/FNs, this paper provides a checklist of relevant functional aspects and implementation details. Besides labeling policies of the test set, we cover areas of vision, occlusion handling, safety-relevant areas, matching criteria, temporal and probabilistic issues, and further aspects. Even though the checklist cannot be fully formalized, it can help practitioners minimize the ambiguity of their tests, which, in turn, makes statements on object perception more reliable and comparable.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools