REVIEW
Improved test-retest reliability of textit{R}₂^* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi echo 3D EPI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Improved test-retest reliability of textit{R}₂^* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi echo 3D EPI
read the original abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of $T_2^*$-weighted ($T_2^*w$) data and quantification of $\textit{R}_2^*$ decay rate and susceptibility ($\chi$) compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ were quantified and compared using their inter-scan difference to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Inter-protocol differences of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected ROIs to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. The quantifications of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ using EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. This result suggested multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for $T_2^*w$ MRI and quantification of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ with reduced scan time, improved test-retest reliability and similar accuracy compared to commonly used 3D GRE.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.