REVIEW 1 cited by
A Methodology for Generative Spelling Correction via Natural Spelling Errors Emulation across Multiple Domains and Languages
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Modern large language models demonstrate impressive capabilities in text generation and generalization. However, they often struggle with solving text editing tasks, particularly when it comes to correcting spelling errors and mistypings. In this paper, we present a methodology for generative spelling correction (SC), which was tested on English and Russian languages and potentially can be extended to any language with minor changes. Our research mainly focuses on exploring natural spelling errors and mistypings in texts and studying the ways those errors can be emulated in correct sentences to effectively enrich generative models' pre-train procedure. We investigate the impact of such emulations and the models' abilities across different text domains. In this work, we investigate two spelling corruption techniques: 1) first one mimics human behavior when making a mistake through leveraging statistics of errors from particular dataset and 2) second adds the most common spelling errors, keyboard miss clicks, and some heuristics within the texts. We conducted experiments employing various corruption strategies, models' architectures and sizes on the pre-training and fine-tuning stages and evaluated the models using single-domain and multi-domain test sets. As a practical outcome of our work, we introduce SAGE(Spell checking via Augmentation and Generative distribution Emulation). It is a library for automatic generative SC that includes a family of pre-trained generative models and built-in augmentation algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Automated Essay Scoring Incorporating Annotations from Automated Feedback Systems
On the PERSUADE corpus, adding generated argument-component tags to essay text raised automated scoring agreement from a QWK of 0.860 to 0.868, while error-only tags lowered it.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.