RECORD
Genome replication in asynchronously growing microbial populations
Subcellular Processes · Submitted 24 Aug 2023
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In both cases, our approach leads to analytical predictions that are in excellent agreement with experimental data and permit to infer key information about the replication program.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Biological cells replicate their genomes in a well-planned manner. The DNA replication program of an organism determines the timing at which different genomic regions are replicated, with fundamental consequences for cell homeostasis and genome stability. Qualitatively, in a growing cell culture, one expects that genomic regions that are replicated early should be more abundant than regions that are replicated late. This abundance pattern can be experimentally measured using deep sequencing. However, a general quantitative theory to explain these data is still lacking. In this paper, we predict the abundance of DNA fragments in asynchronously growing cultures from any given stochastic model of the DNA replication program. As key examples, we present stochastic models of the DNA replication programs in Escherichia coli and in budding yeast. In both cases, our approach leads to analytical predictions that are in excellent agreement with experimental data and permit to infer key information about the replication program. In particular, our method is able to infer the locations of known replication origins in budding yeast with high accuracy. These examples demonstrate that our method can provide insight into a broad range of organisms, from bacteria to eukaryotes.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Biological cells replicate their genomes in a well-planned manner. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The DNA replication program of an organism determines the timing at which different genomic regions are replicated, with fundamental consequences for cell homeostasis and genome stability. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Qualitatively, in a growing cell culture, one expects that genomic regions that are replicated early should be more abundant than regions that are replicated late. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | hedged possibility 0.79 |
| s3 | This abundance pattern can be experimentally measured using deep sequencing. | background 0.77 | 0.09 | 0.02 | asserted 0.90 |
| s4 | However, a general quantitative theory to explain these data is still lacking. | gap 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | In this paper, we predict the abundance of DNA fragments in asynchronously growing cultures from any given stochastic model of the DNA replication program. | contribution 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.22 | asserted 0.98 |
| s6 | As key examples, we present stochastic models of the DNA replication programs in Escherichia coli and in budding yeast. | contribution 0.58 | 0.93 | 0.05 | asserted 0.99 |
| s7 | In both cases, our approach leads to analytical predictions that are in excellent agreement with experimental data and permit to infer key information about the replication program. | result 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.54 | asserted 1.00 |
| s8 | In particular, our method is able to infer the locations of known replication origins in budding yeast with high accuracy. | result 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.16 | asserted 0.99 |
| s9 | These examples demonstrate that our method can provide insight into a broad range of organisms, from bacteria to eukaryotes. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.26 | asserted 0.86 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Biological cells replicate their genomes in a well-planned manner. The DNA replication program of an organism determines the timing at which different genomic regions are replicated, with fundamental consequences for cell homeostasis and genome stability. Qualitatively, in a growing cell culture, one expects that genomic regions that are replicated early should be more abundant than regions that are replicated late. This abundance pattern can be experimentally measured using deep sequencing. However, a general quantitative theory to explain these data is still lacking. In this paper, we predict the abundance of DNA fragments in asynchronously growing cultures from any given stochastic model of the DNA replication program. As key examples, we present stochastic models of the DNA replication programs in Escherichia coli and in budding yeast. In both cases, our approach leads to analytical predictions that are in excellent agreement with experimental data and permit to infer key information about the replication program. In particular, our method is able to infer the locations of known replication origins in budding yeast with high accuracy. These examples demonstrate that our method can provide insight into a broad range of organisms, from bacteria to eukaryotes.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites
Cites as background 1 paper
-
This assumption is sometimes referred to as “identity at birth” in the literature on renewal processes [ref] : all genomes are born identical, and the differences that they might develop as they synthesize can be seen as independent outcomes of the same stochastic process.
Population growth in discrete time: a renewal equation oriented survey · Multiple genome types · 0.89
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.