Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Data-Side Efficiencies for Lightweight Convolutional Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.13057 v1 pith:E4IBG3HY submitted 2023-08-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords lightweightattributesmetricsmodelneuralobjectchoicecomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine how the choice of data-side attributes for two important visual tasks of image classification and object detection can aid in the choice or design of lightweight convolutional neural networks. We show by experimentation how four data attributes - number of classes, object color, image resolution, and object scale affect neural network model size and efficiency. Intra- and inter-class similarity metrics, based on metric learning, are defined to guide the evaluation of these attributes toward achieving lightweight models. Evaluations made using these metrics are shown to require 30x less computation than running full inference tests. We provide, as an example, applying the metrics and methods to choose a lightweight model for a robot path planning application and achieve computation reduction of 66% and accuracy gain of 3.5% over the pre-method model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. StatsMerging: Statistics-Guided Model Merging via Task-Specific Teacher Distillation

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    StatsMerging predicts per-layer merging coefficients from weight statistics and teacher pseudo-labels, achieving 94.5% average accuracy across eight vision tasks, 5.1 points above WEMoE.

Pith tools