Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Splash! Robustifying Donor Pools for Policy Studies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.13688 v1 pith:ZEGCSLS6 submitted 2023-08-25 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords policycontrolsyntheticdonordonorsresearchersstudiesanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Policy researchers using synthetic control methods typically choose a donor pool in part by using policy domain expertise so the untreated units are most like the treated unit in the pre intervention period. This potentially leaves estimation open to biases, especially when researchers have many potential donors. We compare how functional principal component analysis synthetic control, forward-selection, and the original synthetic control method select donors. To do this, we use Gaussian Process simulations as well as policy case studies from West German Reunification, a hotel moratorium in Barcelona, and a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in San Francisco. We then summarize the implications for policy research and provide avenues for future work.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian Donor Set Selection in Synthetic Controls

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gamma–Bernoulli hierarchical prior lets Bayesian synthetic controls select donors and put exact zeros on excluded units while staying on the simplex, with posterior consistency and better recovery of sparse donors i...

Pith tools