Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Halin's Infinite Ray Theorems: Complexity and Reverse Mathematics: Version E

Logic · Submitted 28 Aug 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that several Halin type theorems are much more complicated.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2308.14287 (version 1)
Pith IDMOXG35AR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJames S. Barnes, Jun le Goh, Richard A. Shore. "Halin's Infinite Ray Theorems: Complexity and Reverse Mathematics: Version E." arXiv:2308.14287 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/MOXG35AR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 9,325 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.18 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.16 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Halin [1965] proved that if a graph has $n$ many pairwise disjoint rays for each $n$ then it has infinitely many pairwise disjoint rays. We analyze the complexity of this and other similar results in terms of computable and proof theoretic complexity. The statement of Halin's theorem and the construction proving it seem very much like standard versions of compactness arguments such as K\"{o}nig's Lemma. Those results, while not computable, are relatively simple. They only use arithmetic procedures or, equivalently, finitely many iterations of the Turing jump. We show that several Halin type theorems are much more complicated. They are among the theorems of hyperarithmetic analysis. Such theorems imply the ability to iterate the Turing jump along any computable well ordering. Several important logical principles in this class have been extensively studied beginning with work of Kreisel, H. Friedman, Steel and others in the 1960s and 1970s. Until now, only one purely mathematical example was known. Our work provides many more and so answers Question 30 of Montalb\'{a}n's Open Questions in Reverse Mathematics [2011]. Some of these theorems including ones in Halin [1965] are also shown to have unusual proof theoretic strength as well.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Halin [1965] proved that if a graph has $n$ many pairwise disjoint rays for each $n$ then it has infinitely many pairwise disjoint rays. background 1.00 0.02 0.05 asserted 1.00
s1 We analyze the complexity of this and other similar results in terms of computable and proof theoretic complexity. contribution 0.96 0.92 0.06 asserted 0.96
s2 The statement of Halin's theorem and the construction proving it seem very much like standard versions of compactness arguments such as K\"{o}nig's Lemma. background 0.56 0.25 0.04 hedged possibility 0.74
s3 Those results, while not computable, are relatively simple. background 0.44 0.25 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 They only use arithmetic procedures or, equivalently, finitely many iterations of the Turing jump. background 0.51 0.20 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 We show that several Halin type theorems are much more complicated. result 0.79 0.90 0.36 asserted 1.00
s6 They are among the theorems of hyperarithmetic analysis. result 0.95 0.67 0.24 asserted 1.00
s7 Such theorems imply the ability to iterate the Turing jump along any computable well ordering. interpretation 0.74 0.39 0.15 asserted 1.00
s8 Several important logical principles in this class have been extensively studied beginning with work of Kreisel, H. background 1.00 0.04 0.04 asserted 1.00
s9 Friedman, Steel and others in the 1960s and 1970s. background 1.00 0.03 0.03 asserted 0.80
s10 Until now, only one purely mathematical example was known. gap 0.99 0.06 0.05 asserted 1.00
s11 Our work provides many more and so answers Question 30 of Montalb\'{a}n's Open Questions in Reverse Mathematics [2011]. contribution 0.71 0.94 0.35 asserted 1.00
s12 Some of these theorems including ones in Halin [1965] are also shown to have unusual proof theoretic strength as well. result 0.94 0.93 0.18 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Halin [1965] proved that if a graph has $n$ many pairwise disjoint rays for each $n$ then it has infinitely many pairwise disjoint rays. We analyze the complexity of this and other similar results in terms of computable and proof theoretic complexity. The statement of Halin's theorem and the construction proving it seem very much like standard versions of compactness arguments such as K\"{o}nig's Lemma. Those results, while not computable, are relatively simple. They only use arithmetic procedures or, equivalently, finitely many iterations of the Turing jump. We show that several Halin type theorems are much more complicated. They are among the theorems of hyperarithmetic analysis. Such theorems imply the ability to iterate the Turing jump along any computable well ordering. Several important logical principles in this class have been extensively studied beginning with work of Kreisel, H. Friedman, Steel and others in the 1960s and 1970s. Until now, only one purely mathematical example was known. Our work provides many more and so answers Question 30 of Montalb\'{a}n's Open Questions in Reverse Mathematics [2011]. Some of these theorems including ones in Halin [1965] are also shown to have unusual proof theoretic strength as well.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.