Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Historical patterns of rice farming explain modern-day language use in China and Japan more than modernization and urbanization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.15352 v1 pith:IVICWKT6 submitted 2023-08-29 cs.CL cs.SIphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.CLcs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords ricechinadifferenceslaborlanguageusedculturaldevelopment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We used natural language processing to analyze a billion words to study cultural differences on Weibo, one of China's largest social media platforms. We compared predictions from two common explanations about cultural differences in China (economic development and urban-rural differences) against the less-obvious legacy of rice versus wheat farming. Rice farmers had to coordinate shared irrigation networks and exchange labor to cope with higher labor requirements. In contrast, wheat relied on rainfall and required half as much labor. We test whether this legacy made southern China more interdependent. Across all word categories, rice explained twice as much variance as economic development and urbanization. Rice areas used more words reflecting tight social ties, holistic thought, and a cautious, prevention orientation. We then used Twitter data comparing prefectures in Japan, which largely replicated the results from China. This provides crucial evidence of the rice theory in a different nation, language, and platform.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Citation Sentiment Reflects Multiscale Sociocultural Norms

    cs.SI 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Citation sentiment in neuroscience tracks collaboration, h-index differences, wet/dry-lab culture, and country-level individualism and power distance.

Pith tools