Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Answer-set Programming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.15901 v1 pith:TXO2YCOK submitted 2023-08-30 cs.AI cs.LO

classification cs.AIcs.LO
keywords explanationanswer-setapproachesexplainabilityexplainableexplanationsinterestlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The interest in explainability in artificial intelligence (AI) is growing vastly due to the near ubiquitous state of AI in our lives and the increasing complexity of AI systems. Answer-set Programming (ASP) is used in many areas, among them are industrial optimisation, knowledge management or life sciences, and thus of great interest in the context of explainability. To ensure the successful application of ASP as a problem-solving paradigm in the future, it is thus crucial to investigate explanations for ASP solutions. Such an explanation generally tries to give an answer to the question of why something is, respectively is not, part of the decision produced or solution to the formulated problem. Although several explanation approaches for ASP exist, almost all of them lack support for certain language features that are used in practice. Most notably, this encompasses the various ASP extensions that have been developed in the recent years to enable reasoning over theories, external computations, or neural networks. This project aims to fill some of these gaps and contribute to the state of the art in explainable ASP. We tackle this by extending the language support of existing approaches but also by the development of novel explanation formalisms, like contrastive explanations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dspy-based Neural-Symbolic Pipeline to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A DSPy-orchestrated LLM plus Answer Set Programming pipeline reports 82% average accuracy on StepGame and 69% on SparQA, well above direct prompting baselines.

Pith tools