REVIEW 5 cited by
Top Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators -- An Update
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We generalize and update our former top quark mass calibration framework for Monte Carlo (MC) event generators based on the $e^+e^-$ hadron-level 2-jettiness $\tau_2$ distribution in the resonance region for boosted $t\bar t$ production, that was used to relate the PYTHIA 8.205 top mass parameter $m_t^{\rm MC}$ to the MSR mass $m_t^{\rm MSR}(R)$ and the pole mass $m_t^{\rm pole}$. The current most precise direct top mass measurements specifically determine $m_t^{\rm MC}$. The updated framework includes the addition of the shape variables sum of jet masses $\tau_s$ and modified jet mass $\tau_m$, and the treatment of two more gap subtraction schemes to remove the ${\cal O}(\Lambda_{\rm QCD})$ renormalon related to large-angle soft radiation. These generalizations entail implementing a more versatile shape-function fit procedure and accounting for a certain type of $(m_t/Q)^2$ power corrections to achieve gap-scheme and observable independent results. The theoretical description employs boosted heavy-quark effective theory (bHQET) at next-to-next-to-logarithmic order (N$^2$LL), matched to soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) at N$^2$LL and full QCD at next-to-leading order (NLO), and includes the dominant top width effects. Furthermore, the software framework has been modernized to use standard file and event record formats. We update the top mass calibration results by applying the new framework to PYTHIA 8.205, HERWIG 7.2 and SHERPA 2.2.11. Even though the hadron-level resonance positions produced by the three generators differ significantly for the same top mass parameter $m_t^{\rm MC}$ value, the calibration shows that these differences arise from the hadronization modeling. Indeed, we find that $m_t^{\rm MC}$ agrees with $m_t^{\rm MSR}(1\,\mbox{GeV})$ within $200$ MeV for the three generators and differs from the pole mass by $350$ to $600$ MeV.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Precision $e^+e^-$ Hemisphere Masses in the Dijet Region with Power Corrections
N3LL' resummation for heavy jet and dihemisphere masses in the dijet region, with a new claim that heavy jet mass moments require an extra non-perturbative parameter at order 1/Q.
-
On the extraction of $\alpha_\textit{em}(m_Z^2)$ at Tera-$Z$
Forward-region Bhabha ratios at Tera-Z could extract alpha_em(m_Z^2) with a projected statistical sensitivity of about 6e-6, below the current bottleneck.
-
Top-quark mass interpretation from simulation of top-flavoured mesons
Comparing Pythia top-pair events to fictitious top-meson samples linked by HQET yields a 200–300 MeV shift between the Monte Carlo top mass and the pole mass.
-
Three-loop jet function for boosted heavy quarks
The three-loop inclusive bHQET jet function for boosted heavy quarks is computed analytically, completing the fixed-order ingredients for N3LL' top-mass observables.
-
On Determining $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ from Dijets in $e^+e^-$ Thrust
An updated N3LL'+O(alpha_s^3) thrust analysis yields alpha_s(m_Z)=0.1136 +/- 0.0012 from a dijet-restricted global fit, stable under fit-range, gap-scheme, and hadronization-model variations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.