pith. sign in

arxiv: 2309.02338 · v6 · submitted 2023-09-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · cs.SY· econ.GN· eess.SY· q-fin.EC

Emissions Assessment of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Broadband Megaconstellations; Starlink, OneWeb and Kuiper

Ogutu B. Osoro , Edward J. Oughton , Andrew R. Wilson , Akhil Rao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 07:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP cs.SYecon.GNeess.SYq-fin.EC
keywords LEO megaconstellationsemissions assessmentStarlinkOneWebKuiperbroadbandcarbon footprintsustainability
0
0 comments X

The pith

LEO megaconstellations deliver faster rural broadband but generate 250 kg CO2eq per subscriber annually, six to eight times the rate of terrestrial 4G networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates lifecycle emissions from the first phase of Starlink, OneWeb, and Kuiper, which together plan thousands of satellites launched by rockets. It reports that each subscriber produces roughly 250 kg of CO2 equivalent per year, driven mainly by fuel combustion during launches and operations. This intensity exceeds ground-based 4G by a factor of six to eight, even while the networks extend high-speed internet to remote communities. The authors note the tension with sustainable development goals and flag larger footprints expected from planned expansions.

Core claim

Phase 1 deployments of the three constellations produce emissions equivalent to 250 kg CO2eq per subscriber per year from rocket fuels and related activities, representing 6-8 times the intensity of comparative terrestrial 4G mobile broadband while still providing improved speeds for rural and remote users.

What carries the argument

Per-subscriber emissions intensity derived from satellite counts, launch cadence, fuel emission factors, lifetimes, and uptake rates across the three constellations.

If this is right

  • Broadband gains support sustainable development goals but increase the space sector's climate footprint.
  • Phase 2 expansions involving an order of magnitude more satellites will multiply total emissions.
  • Policymakers face explicit trade-offs between connectivity benefits and emissions mitigation.
  • Sustainability analytics of this type apply directly to ongoing constellation buildouts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adoption of lower-emission propellants or reusable launch systems could narrow the gap with terrestrial networks.
  • The same per-subscriber framing could be extended to assess other large orbital infrastructure projects.
  • Global rollout might require integration into national carbon accounting frameworks.

Load-bearing premise

The 250 kg CO2eq figure rests on specific choices for rocket fuel emission factors, launch frequency, satellite lifetime, and subscriber numbers.

What would settle it

An independent tally of total CO2 emissions from all relevant launches and operations divided by verified active subscriber counts for these constellations would confirm or contradict the per-subscriber value.

read the original abstract

The growth of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) broadband satellite megaconstellations is rapidly increasing the number of rocket launches. While improving broadband Internet helps achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there are also significant environmental emissions produced from burning rocket fuels. We present sustainability analytics for phase 1 of the three main LEO constellations including Amazon Kuiper (3,236 satellites), Eutelsat Group's OneWeb (648 satellites), and SpaceX Starlink (4,425 satellites). We find that LEO megaconstellations provide substantially improved broadband speeds for rural and remote communities but are roughly 6-8 times more emissions intensive (250 kg CO2eq/subscriber/year) than comparative terrestrial 4G mobile broadband. Policy makers must carefully consider the trade-off between improving broadband Internet to further the SDGs while mitigating the growing space sector environmental footprint, particularly regarding phase 2 plans to launch an order-of-magnitude more satellites.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript assesses CO2-equivalent emissions from the phase-1 deployments of Starlink (4,425 satellites), OneWeb (648 satellites), and Kuiper (3,236 satellites), concluding that these LEO megaconstellations deliver improved rural broadband but are 6–8 times more emissions-intensive than terrestrial 4G mobile broadband, at roughly 250 kg CO2eq per subscriber per year. It calls for policy attention to the space-sector footprint ahead of larger phase-2 expansions.

Significance. If the per-subscriber allocation is reproducible, the work supplies a concrete quantitative comparison between connectivity benefits and launch-related emissions that can inform SDG-related broadband policy. Explicit constellation sizes and the direct 4G benchmark add practical value for regulators weighing expansion plans.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results / Emissions calculation (no equation or table number supplied for the allocation step)] The central 250 kg CO2eq/subscriber/year figure and 6–8× multiplier rest on the allocation of total launch emissions (fuel combustion factors × number of launches) across an assumed subscriber base. The manuscript does not report the explicit values or sources used for (a) satellites per launch, (b) satellite lifetime, (c) subscriber uptake per satellite, or (d) the emission factor (kg CO2eq per kg fuel), nor does it present a sensitivity analysis on these parameters. This directly affects the headline comparison and must be addressed with transparent sourcing and ranges.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the headline comparison without methods, data sources, or uncertainty ranges; the full text should move a concise methods summary or table of input parameters into the abstract or a prominent early section for readability.
  2. Figure or table presenting the per-subscriber breakdown (launch emissions divided by subscriber count) would improve traceability of the 250 kg value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for highlighting the policy relevance of the per-subscriber emissions comparison. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve methodological transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Emissions calculation (no equation or table number supplied for the allocation step)] The central 250 kg CO2eq/subscriber/year figure and 6–8× multiplier rest on the allocation of total launch emissions (fuel combustion factors × number of launches) across an assumed subscriber base. The manuscript does not report the explicit values or sources used for (a) satellites per launch, (b) satellite lifetime, (c) subscriber uptake per satellite, or (d) the emission factor (kg CO2eq per kg fuel), nor does it present a sensitivity analysis on these parameters. This directly affects the headline comparison and must be addressed with transparent sourcing and ranges.

    Authors: We agree that the allocation step requires explicit documentation. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (with accompanying table) that reports: (a) satellites per launch drawn from public launch records for each operator, (b) satellite lifetime assumptions taken from operator FCC filings and public statements, (c) subscriber-uptake estimates derived from reported active-user counts and beam-coverage models, and (d) the CO2eq emission factor per kilogram of propellant, sourced from standard combustion inventories. We will also add a one-way sensitivity analysis that varies each parameter across plausible ranges and shows the resulting spread in the 250 kg CO2eq/subscriber/year central value and the 6–8× multiplier relative to 4G. These additions will allow direct reproduction of the headline results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents an emissions assessment based on external data sources for rocket fuel factors, launch numbers, satellite counts, and subscriber estimates. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are described that reduce any prediction or result to the paper's own inputs by construction. The per-subscriber figure is obtained by standard division of total emissions by assumed uptake, which is an explicit modeling choice rather than a self-definitional or fitted-input circularity. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or prior author work in a load-bearing way.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard life-cycle assessment assumptions for rocket emissions and subscriber projections; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • rocket fuel emission factors
    Used to convert launch activity into CO2eq; values not stated in abstract.
  • subscriber uptake and lifetime assumptions
    Required to normalize total emissions to the per-subscriber annual figure.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard life-cycle assessment methods can be applied directly to LEO launch emissions without major unaccounted factors
    Invoked to produce the 250 kg figure from launch data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5728 in / 1200 out tokens · 23106 ms · 2026-05-24T07:07:48.075566+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Strathclyde space systems database: 8th International Systems & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications Conference,

    A. R. Wilson, M. Vasile, C. Maddock, and K. J. Baker, “The Strathclyde space systems database: 8th International Systems & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications Conference,” Sep. 2018. Accessed: Aug. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://atpi.eventsair.com/QuickEventWebsitePortal/secesa-2018/secesa

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Advanced methods of life cycle assessment for space systems

    A. R. Wilson, “Advanced methods of life cycle assessment for space systems.”

    work page

  3. [3]

    Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing,

    G. Myhre et al., “Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing,” Clim. Change 2013 Phys. Sci. Basis Contrib. Work. Group Fifth Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    J. B. Guinée et al. , Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Series: Eco-efficiency in industry and science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2022. Accessed: Jun. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-projects/science/cml-new-dutc...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Abiotic resource depletion in LCA -Improving characterisation factors for abiotic resource depletion as recommended in the new Dutch LCA Handbook,

    L. van Oers, A. de Koning, J. B. Guinée, and G. Huppes, “Abiotic resource depletion in LCA -Improving characterisation factors for abiotic resource depletion as recommended in the new Dutch LCA Handbook,” Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, 2002, 2002

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Usetox®2.0 Documentation (Version 1),

    P. Fantke et al. , “Usetox®2.0 Documentation (Version 1),.” 2023. [Online]. Available: http://usetox.org

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Environmental sustainability of future proposed space activities,

    L. Miraux, A. R. Wilson, and G. J. Dominguez Calabuig, “Environmental sustainability of future proposed space activities,” Acta Astronau t., vol. 200, pp. 329 –346, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.034 2022

  8. [8]

    Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions,

    M. N. Ross and P. M. Sheaffer, “Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions,” Earths Future, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 177–196, 2014, doi: 10.1002/2013EF000160

    work page doi:10.1002/2013ef000160 2014

  9. [9]

    G. J. Dominguez Calabuig, L. Miraux, A. Wilson, A. Pasini, and A. Sarritzu, Eco-design of future reusable launchers: insight into their life cycle and atmospheric impact . 2022. doi: 10.13009/EUCASS2022 - 7353

    work page doi:10.13009/eucass2022 2022

  10. [10]

    Individual megaconstellations,

    J. McDowell, “Individual megaconstellations,” 2024. A ccessed: Feb. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Amazon makes historic launch investment to advance Project Kuiper,

    “Amazon makes historic launch investment to advance Project Kuiper,” US About Amazon. Accessed: Feb. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.aboutamazon.com/ news/innovation-at- amazon/amazon-makes-historic-launch-investment-to-advance-project-kuiper

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Dynamical Link Budget in Satellite Communications at Ka -Band: Testing Radiometeorological Forecasts With Hayabusa2 Deep -Space Mission Sup port Data,

    M. Biscarini et al. , “Dynamical Link Budget in Satellite Communications at Ka -Band: Testing Radiometeorological Forecasts With Hayabusa2 Deep -Space Mission Sup port Data,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 3935–3950, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3125751

    work page doi:10.1109/twc.2021.3125751 2022

  13. [13]

    Link budget calculation in optical LEO satellite downlinks with on/off-keying and large signal divergence: A simplified methodology,

    D. Giggenbach, M. T. Knopp, and C. Fuchs, “Link budget calculation in optical LEO satellite downlinks with on/off-keying and large signal divergence: A simplified methodology,” Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 460–476, 2023, doi: 10.1002/sat.1478

    work page doi:10.1002/sat.1478 2023

  14. [14]

    Link Budget Analysis for LEO Satellites Based on the Statistics of the Elevation Angle,

    J. M. Gongora -Torres, C. Vargas -Rosales, A. Aragón -Zavala, and R. Villalpando -Hernandez, “Link Budget Analysis for LEO Satellites Based on the Statistics of the Elevation Angle,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 14518–14528, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3147829

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3147829 2022

  15. [15]

    Point-to-Point Communication in Integrated Satellite-Aerial 6G Networks: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges,

    N. Saeed, H. Almorad, H. Dahrouj, T. Y. Al -Naffouri, J. S. Shamma, and M. -S. Alouini, “Point-to-Point Communication in Integrated Satellite-Aerial 6G Networks: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 2, pp. 1505–1525, 2021, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2021.3093110

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2021.3093110 2021

  16. [16]

    Power Budgets for CubeSat Radios to Support Ground Communicatio ns and Inter - Satellite Links,

    O. Popescu, “Power Budgets for CubeSat Radios to Support Ground Communicatio ns and Inter - Satellite Links,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 12618–12625, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2721948

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2017.2721948 2017

  17. [17]

    Satellite constellation design for 5G wireless networks of mobile communications,

    R. Muttiah, “Satellite constellation design for 5G wireless networks of mobile communications,” Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 441–459, 2023, doi: 10.1002/sat.1477. 44

    work page doi:10.1002/sat.1477 2023

  18. [18]

    Architectures for next generation high throughput satellite systems,

    Y. Vasavada, R. Gopal, C. Ravishankar, G. Zakaria, and N. BenAmmar, “Architectures for next generation high throughput satellite systems,” Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 523– 546, 2016, doi: 10.1002/sat.1175

    work page doi:10.1002/sat.1175 2016

  19. [19]

    Accessed: Sep

    Digital Video Broadcasting Project, “Second generation framing structure, channel coding and modulation systems for Broadcasting, Interactive Services, News Gathering and other broadband satellite applications; Part 2: DVB-S2 Extensions (DVB-S2X),” DVB. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dvb.org/?standard=second -generation-framing-stru...

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Hawaiian Airlines debuts free inflight Wi -Fi from SpaceX’s Starlink,

    M. S. Brennan Morgan, “Hawaiian Airlines debuts free inflight Wi -Fi from SpaceX’s Starlink,” CNBC, Englewood Cliffs, Feb. 08, 2024. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/08/hawaiian-airlines-debuts-spacex-starlink-free-inflight-wi-fi- .html

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Aerolíneas Argentinas Selects Multi Orbit Inflight Connectivity,

    “Aerolíneas Argentinas Selects Multi Orbit Inflight Connectivity,” OneWeb. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://oneweb.net/resources/aerolineas -argentinas-selects-multi-orbit-inflight- connectivity

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    A simple guide to satellite broadband limitations,

    R. Steele, “A simple guide to satellite broadband limitations,” Telzed Limited UK, 2020

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Musk says Starlink ‘economically viable’ with around 1,000 satellites,

    C. Henry, “Musk says Starlink ‘economically viable’ with around 1,000 satellites,” SpaceNews. Accessed: Jun. 08, 2023. [Online]. A vailable: https://spacenews.com/musk -says-starlink- economically-viable-with-around-1000-satellites/

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband,

    I. del Portillo, B. G. Cameron, and E. F. Crawley, “A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 159, pp. 123–135, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.040 2019

  25. [25]

    SpaceX Starlink Internet Service Surpasses 1M Subscribers,

    R. Jewett, “SpaceX Starlink Internet Service Surpasses 1M Subscribers,” Via Satellite. Accessed: Jun. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.satell itetoday.com/broadband/2022/12/19/spacex- starlink-internet-service-surpasses-1m-subscribers/

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    OneWeb and Eutelsat merger sets up a European satellite internet giant to take on SpaceX, Amazon,

    J. Hicks, “OneWeb and Eutelsat merger sets up a European satellite internet giant to take on SpaceX, Amazon,” The Verge. Accessed: Jun. 05, 2023. [Online]. Av ailable: https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/26/23279205/satellite-internet-oneweb-eutelsat-starlink- project-kuiper-competition

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Amazon’s Project Kuiper highlights new connections to AWS and partners in Japan,

    A. Boyle, “Amazon’s Project Kuiper highlights new connections to AWS and partners in Japan,” GeekWire. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.geekwire.com/2023/amazon- project-kuiper-aws-japan/

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet surpasses 400,000 subscribers globally,

    M. Sheetz, “SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet surpasses 400,000 subscribers globally,” CNBC. Accessed: Jun. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/202 2/05/25/spacexs-starlink- surpasses-400000-subscribers-globally.html

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    SpaceX now plans for 5 million Starlink customers in US, up from 1 million,

    J. Brodkin, “SpaceX now plans for 5 million Starlink customers in US, up from 1 million,” Ars Technica. Accessed: Jun. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arstechnica.com/informati on- technology/2020/08/spacex-now-plans-for-5-million-starlink-customers-in-us-up-from-1-million/

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Everything you need to know about Project Kuiper, Amazon’s satellite broadband network,

    T. Kohnstamm, “Everything you need to know about Project Kuiper, Amazon’s satellite broadband network,” US About Amazon. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online] . Available: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/innovation-at-amazon/what-is-amazon-project-kuiper

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    OneWeb and Eutelsat merger sets up a European satellite internet giant to take on SpaceX, Amazon,

    J. Hicks, “OneWeb and Eutelsat merger sets up a European satellite internet giant to take on SpaceX, Amazon,” The Verge. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2024. [Online] . Available: https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/26/23279205/satellite-internet-oneweb-eutelsat-starlink- project-kuiper-competition

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Is there a ‘best’ owner of satellite internet? | McKinsey,

    C. Daehnick, A. Menard, and B. Wiseman, “Is there a ‘best’ owner of satellite internet? | McKinsey,” McKinsey, 2022. Access ed: Feb. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: 45 https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/aerospace-and-defense/our-insights/is-there-a-best-owner- of-satellite-internet

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Analysis of Geostationary Federal Communications Commission Satellite Applications from 2000 to 2022,

    P. Post, K. Fleming, C. Canavan, S. Cho, G. Aher, and W. Lohmeyer, “Analysis of Geostationary Federal Communications Commission Satellite Applications from 2000 to 2022,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 88–103, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.2514/1.A35660

    work page doi:10.2514/1.a35660 2000

  34. [34]

    Cost of Capital

    “Cost of Capital.” Accessed: Jun. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.html

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2,

    K. Rennert et al., “Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2,” Nature, vol. 610, no. 7933, Art. no. 7933, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9 2022

  36. [36]

    Comparison of geostationary and low -orbit ‘round dance’ satellite communication systems,

    S. V. Reznik, D. V. Reut, and M. S. Shustilova, “Comparison of geostationary and low -orbit ‘round dance’ satellite communication systems,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. , vol. 971, no. 5, p. 052045, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/971/5/052045

    work page doi:10.1088/1757-899x/971/5/052045 2020

  37. [37]

    OneWeb 2022 Annual Report,

    OneWeb Holdings Limited, “OneWeb 2022 Annual Report,” London, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://assets.oneweb.net/s3fs-public/2022-08/AnnualReport_2022.pdf

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    SpaceX, Starlink and Tesla Moving into Orbit?,

    A. Jonas, A. Sinkevicius, R. Lalwani, G. Dailey, and B. Kovanis, “SpaceX, Starlink and Tesla Moving into Orbit?,” Morgan Stanley , 20 19, [Online]. Available: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6416324/SPACE-20190917-SpaceX-valuation-Morgan- Stanley.pdf

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    SpaceX Starlink Satellites Could Cost 250,000 Each and Falcon 9 Costs Less than 30 Million \textbar NextBigFuture.com

    B. Wang, “SpaceX Starlink Satellites Could Cost 250,000 Each and Falcon 9 Costs Less than 30 Million \textbar NextBigFuture.com. ” Dec. 10, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/12/spacex-starlink-satellites-cost-well-below-500000-each- and-falcon-9-launches-less-than-30-million.html

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Ariane 5 Last Launch

    B. Wang, “Ariane 5 Last Launch.” Accessed: Jan. 11, 2024. [Online]. Avai lable: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/ariane-5-last-launch.html

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Cost Estimating Handbook,

    W. Duggleby, “Cost Estimating Handbook,” NASA. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.nasa.gov/content/cost-estimating-handbook

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    A Techno -Economic Assessment and Tradespace Exploration of Low Earth Orbit Mega-Constellations,

    K. T. Li, C. A. Hofmann, H. R eder, and A. Knopp, “A Techno -Economic Assessment and Tradespace Exploration of Low Earth Orbit Mega-Constellations,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 24–30, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2200312

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2200312 2023

  43. [43]

    SES Annual Report 2022,

    SES S.A, “SES Annual Report 2022,” Betzdorf, Luxembourg, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ses.com/sites/default/files/2023-02/230227_SES_AR2022_Final.pdf

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Satellite Flight Operations and Engineering | Intelsat

    Intelsat Ltd, “Satellite Flight Operations and Engineering | Intelsat.” Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.intelsat.com/space/products/satellite-operations/

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    OneWeb signs ground station deal with Paratus,

    D. Swinhoe, “OneWeb signs ground station deal with Paratus,” Data Center Dynamics. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/oneweb -signs- ground-station-deal-with-paratus/

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    SpaceX Plans To Operate 99 Starlink Gateway Stations Across 40 U.S. States,

    E. J. Arevalo, “SpaceX Plans To Operate 99 Starlink Gateway Stations Across 40 U.S. States,” Tesmanian, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesmanian-blog/cali-1

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    FY 2023 Regulatory Fees – International and Satellite Services,

    Federal Communications Commission, “FY 2023 Regulatory Fees – International and Satellite Services,” Washington DC, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC - 396410A1.pdf

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    The cost, coverage and rollout implications of 5G infrastructure in Britain,

    E. J. Oughton and Z. Frias, “The cost, coverage and rollout implications of 5G infrastructure in Britain,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 636–652, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.07.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.07.009 2018

  49. [49]

    Musk shakes up SpaceX in race to make satellite launch window: sources,

    E. M. Johnson and J. Roulette, “Musk shakes up SpaceX in race to make satellite launch window: sources,” Reuters, Nov. 01, 2018. Accessed: Feb. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1N50F4/ 46

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    SES Annual Report 2022,

    S. S.A, “SES Annual Report 2022,” Betzdorf, Luxembourg, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ses.com/sites/default/files/2023-02/230227_SES_AR2022_Final.pdf

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Starlink launches in Kenya, chooses Karibu Connect as its authorised reseller,

    V. Fakiya, “Starlink launches in Kenya, chooses Karibu Connect as its authorised reseller,” Techpoint Africa, Nairobi, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://techpoint.africa/2023/07/19/starlink-launches- kenya-partners-karibu-connect/

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Energy-Efficient Solutions for Remote Satellite Ground Stations,

    Energy5, “Energy-Efficient Solutions for Remote Satellite Ground Stations,” Energy5. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://energy5.com/energy -efficient-solutions-for-remote-satellite- ground-stations

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Electricity prices around the world,

    Global Petrol Prices, “Electricity prices around the world,” GlobalPetrolPrices.com. Accessed: Jan. 15,

    work page

  54. [54]

    Available: https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/

    [Online]. Available: https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/

    work page

  55. [55]

    Fi ber Optic Network Construction: Process and Build Costs,

    J. Kim, “Fi ber Optic Network Construction: Process and Build Costs,” Dgtl Infra. Accessed: Jan. 15,

    work page

  56. [56]

    Available: https://dgtlinfra.com/fiber-optic-network-construction-process-costs/

    [Online]. Available: https://dgtlinfra.com/fiber-optic-network-construction-process-costs/

    work page

  57. [57]

    Kuiper Systems LLC FCC Filing,

    F. C. Commission, “Kuiper Systems LLC FCC Filing,” 2020, [Online] . Available: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-102A1.pdf

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    OneWeb FCC Filing,

    F. C. Commission, “OneWeb FCC Filing,” vol. FCC 17 -77, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-17-77A1.pdf

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    SpaceX’s new Starlink satellite internet terminal has a kickstand,

    W. Davis, “SpaceX’s new Starlink satellite internet terminal has a kickstand,” The Verge, Nov. 20, 2023. Accessed: Feb. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/19/23968395/spacex-starlink-satellite-internet-terminal- kickstand-improved-fov-ip67-weather-rating

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet surpasses 400,000 subscribers globally,

    M. Sheetz, “SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet surpasses 400,000 subscribers globally,” CNBC. May 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/25/spacexs -starlink-surpasses- 400000-subscribers-globally.html

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    SpaceX Starlink Intern et Service Surpasses 1M Subscribers,

    R. Jewett, “SpaceX Starlink Intern et Service Surpasses 1M Subscribers,” Via Satellite. Dec. 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.satellitetoday.com/broadband/2022/12/19/spacex -starlink- internet-service-surpasses-1m-subscribers/

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    FCC Grants Space X’s Satellite Broadband Modification Application,

    Federal Communication Commission, “FCC Grants Space X’s Satellite Broadband Modification Application,” Federal Communications Commission. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-grants-spacexs-satellite-broadband-modification-application

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    FCC Authorizes Kuiper Satellite Constellation,

    Federal Communications Com mission, “FCC Authorizes Kuiper Satellite Constellation,” Federal Communications Commission. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-authorizes-kuiper-satellite-constellation

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    F CC Grants OneWeb US Access for Broadband Satellite Constellation,

    Federal Communications Commission, “F CC Grants OneWeb US Access for Broadband Satellite Constellation,” Federal Communications Commission. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-grants-oneweb-us-access-broadband-satellite-constellation

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Falcon User’s Guide,

    SpaceX LLC, “Falcon User’s Guide,” Space Exploration Technologies Corp, Carlifornia, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.spacex.com/media/falcon-users-guide-2021-09.pdf

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Soyuz -FG’s long road to retirement

    A. Zak, “Soyuz -FG’s long road to retirement.” Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.russianspaceweb.com/soyuz-fg.html

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Ariane 5: The Heavy Launcher,

    ArianneSpace Group, “Ariane 5: The Heavy Launcher,” Arianespace. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.arianespace.com/vehicle/ariane-5/

    work page 2022