REVIEW 1 cited by
Low disorder and high valley splitting in silicon
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The electrical characterisation of classical and quantum devices is a critical step in the development cycle of heterogeneous material stacks for semiconductor spin qubits. In the case of silicon, properties such as disorder and energy separation of conduction band valleys are commonly investigated individually upon modifications in selected parameters of the material stack. However, this reductionist approach fails to consider the interdependence between different structural and electronic properties at the danger of optimising one metric at the expense of the others. Here, we achieve a significant improvement in both disorder and valley splitting by taking a co-design approach to the material stack. We demonstrate isotopically-purified, strained quantum wells with high mobility of 3.14(8)$\times$10$^5$ cm$^2$/Vs and low percolation density of 6.9(1)$\times$10$^{10}$ cm$^{-2}$. These low disorder quantum wells support quantum dots with low charge noise of 0.9(3) $\mu$eV/Hz$^{1/2}$ and large mean valley splitting energy of 0.24(7) meV, measured in qubit devices. By striking the delicate balance between disorder, charge noise, and valley splitting, these findings provide a benchmark for silicon as a host semiconductor for quantum dot qubits. We foresee the application of these heterostructures in larger, high-performance quantum processors.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fast charge noise sensing using a spectator valley state in a singlet-triplet qubit
A valley excitation in a singlet-triplet qubit can act as a colocated, dispersive charge-noise sensor with estimated sub-millisecond response times.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.