Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Graph IRs for Impure Higher-Order Languages (Technical Report)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.08118 v1 pith:SS22NEKA submitted 2023-09-15 cs.PL

classification cs.PL
keywords lambdamathsfcalculusdependencyfunctionallogicaladequacycode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This is a companion report for the OOPSLA 2023 paper of the same title, presenting a detailed end-to-end account of the $\lambda^*_{\mathsf{G}}$ graph IR, at a level of detail beyond a regular conference paper. Our first concern is adequacy and soundness of $\lambda^*_{\mathsf{G}}$, which we derive from a direct-style imperative functional language (a variant of Bao et al.'s $\lambda^*$-calculus with reachability types and a simple effect system) by a series of type-preserving translations into a calculus in monadic normalform (MNF). Static reachability types and effects entirely inform $\lambda^*_{\mathsf{G}}$'s dependency synthesis. We argue for its adequacy by proving its functional properties along with dependency safety via progress and preservation lemmas with respect to a notion of call-by-value (CBV) reduction that checks the observed order of effects. Our second concern is establishing the correctness of $\lambda^*_{\mathsf{G}}$'s equational rules that drive compiler optimizations (e.g., DCE, $\lambda$-hoisting, etc.), by proving contextual equivalence using logical relations. A key insight is that the functional properties of dependency synthesis permit a logical relation on $\lambda^*_{\mathsf{G}}$ in MNF in terms of previously developed logical relations for the direct-style $\lambda^*$-calculus. Finally, we also include a longer version of the conference paper's section on code generation and code motion for $\lambda^*_{\mathsf{G}}$ as implemented in Scala~LMS.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What's in the Box: Ergonomic and Expressive Capture Tracking over Generic Data Structures (Extended Version)

    cs.PL 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10 partial

    Reach capabilities name capabilities inside generic data structures, making Scala's capture checking expressive enough to type-check the standard collections library with small source changes.

Pith tools