Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Few-Shot Adaptation for Parsing Contextual Utterances with LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.10168 v1 pith:DGQSCU7K submitted 2023-09-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords contextualutterancesparsingannotationcostexamplesllmsparsers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We evaluate the ability of semantic parsers based on large language models (LLMs) to handle contextual utterances. In real-world settings, there typically exists only a limited number of annotated contextual utterances due to annotation cost, resulting in an imbalance compared to non-contextual utterances. Therefore, parsers must adapt to contextual utterances with a few training examples. We examine four major paradigms for doing so in conversational semantic parsing i.e., Parse-with-Utterance-History, Parse-with-Reference-Program, Parse-then-Resolve, and Rewrite-then-Parse. To facilitate such cross-paradigm comparisons, we construct SMCalFlow-EventQueries, a subset of contextual examples from SMCalFlow with additional annotations. Experiments with in-context learning and fine-tuning suggest that Rewrite-then-Parse is the most promising paradigm when holistically considering parsing accuracy, annotation cost, and error types.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Randomly Sampled Language Reasoning Problems Elucidate Limitations of In-Context Learning

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On randomly sampled 3-state DFA language tasks, foundation LLMs underperform n-gram baselines under pure in-context-learning prompts.

Pith tools