REVIEW 2 cited by
Sampling-Based Motion Planning: A Comparative Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Sampling-based motion planning is one of the fundamental paradigms to generate robot motions, and a cornerstone of robotics research. This comparative review provides an up-to-date guideline and reference manual for the use of sampling-based motion planning algorithms. This includes a history of motion planning, an overview about the most successful planners, and a discussion on their properties. It is also shown how planners can handle special cases and how extensions of motion planning can be accommodated. To put sampling-based motion planning into a larger context, a discussion of alternative motion generation frameworks is presented which highlights their respective differences to sampling-based motion planning. Finally, a set of sampling-based motion planners are compared on 24 challenging planning problems. This evaluation gives insights into which planners perform well in which situations and where future research would be required. This comparative review thereby provides not only a useful reference manual for researchers in the field, but also a guideline for practitioners to make informed algorithmic decisions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FMT$^{x}$: An Efficient and Asymptotically Optimal Extension of the Fast Marching Tree for Dynamic Replanning
FMTX extends FMT* with a cost-based re-evaluation rule and local obstacle repair so the same sampled tree can be replanned efficiently after environment changes, with claimed asymptotic optimality.
-
VIMPPI: Enhancing Model Predictive Path Integral Control with Variational Integration for Underactuated Systems
Using a variational integrator inside MPPI rollouts lets the controller plan 4-20 times further ahead, improving balance uptime on underactuated double pendulums.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.