REVIEW 3 cited by
Language Models for Business Optimisation with a Real World Case Study in Production Scheduling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Business optimisation has been used extensively to determine optimal solutions for challenging business operations. Problem formulation is an important part of business optimisation as it influences both the validity of solutions and the efficiency of the optimisation process. While different optimisation modelling languages have been developed, problem formulation is still not a trivial task and usually requires optimisation expertise and problem-domain knowledge. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance across different language-related tasks. Since problem formulation can be viewed as a translation task, there is a potential to leverage LLMs to automate problem formulation. However, developing an LLM for problem formulation is challenging, due to limited training data, and the complexity of real-world optimisation problems. Several prompt engineering methods have been proposed in the literature to automate problem formulation with LLMs. While the initial results are encouraging, the accuracy of formulations generated by these methods can still be significantly improved. In this paper, we present an LLM-based framework for automating problem formulation in business optimization. Our approach introduces a method for fine-tuning cost-efficient LLMs specifically tailored to specialized business optimization challenges. The experiment results demonstrate that our framework can generate accurate formulations for conventional and real-world business optimisation problems in production scheduling. Extensive analyses show the effectiveness and the convergence of the proposed fine-tuning method. The proposed method also shows very competitive performance when compared with the state-of-the-art prompt engineering methods in the literature when tested on general linear programming problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Optimization Problem Solving Can Transition to Evolutionary Agentic Workflows
An evolutionary loop of foundation-model agents could automate the full optimization pipeline, but the paper's evidence only covers two isolated components.
-
A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving
A literature survey that classifies LLM-based optimization research into modeling and solving, with solving divided into LLMs as optimizers, low-level components, and high-level managers.
-
SmartPilot: A Multiagent CoPilot for Adaptive and Intelligent Manufacturing
A three-agent neurosymbolic copilot integrates anomaly prediction, production forecasting, and QA for smart manufacturing, reporting 93% anomaly accuracy and 4.7/5 user satisfaction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.