REVIEW 3 cited by
Non-Exchangeable Conformal Risk Control
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Split conformal prediction has recently sparked great interest due to its ability to provide formally guaranteed uncertainty sets or intervals for predictions made by black-box neural models, ensuring a predefined probability of containing the actual ground truth. While the original formulation assumes data exchangeability, some extensions handle non-exchangeable data, which is often the case in many real-world scenarios. In parallel, some progress has been made in conformal methods that provide statistical guarantees for a broader range of objectives, such as bounding the best $F_1$-score or minimizing the false negative rate in expectation. In this paper, we leverage and extend these two lines of work by proposing non-exchangeable conformal risk control, which allows controlling the expected value of any monotone loss function when the data is not exchangeable. Our framework is flexible, makes very few assumptions, and allows weighting the data based on its relevance for a given test example; a careful choice of weights may result on tighter bounds, making our framework useful in the presence of change points, time series, or other forms of distribution drift. Experiments with both synthetic and real world data show the usefulness of our method.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Conformal Coverage Guarantees for Any Video Temporal Grounder
A post-hoc conformal wrapper converts any video temporal grounder's single interval into a region that contains the true moment with probability at least 1-alpha.
-
Conformal Uncertainty Indicator for Continual Test-Time Adaptation
CUI uses conformal prediction sets, with a hand-tuned coverage compensation, to measure uncertainty and reweight adaptation in continual test-time adaptation, improving error rates on three corruption benchmarks.
-
Calibrating Decision Robustness via Inverse Conformal Risk Control
A conformal-style estimator certifies simultaneous upper bounds on miscoverage and regret for robust predict-then-optimize policies, tracing a Pareto frontier for choosing the robustness level.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.