Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CompVPD: Iteratively Identifying Vulnerability Patches Based on Human Validation Results with a Precise Context

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02530 v2 pith:QUXGQYOA submitted 2023-10-04 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords patchescompvpdvulnerabilityapproachescontextcodeidentifyprecise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Applying security patches in open source software timely is critical for ensuring the security of downstream applications. However, it is challenging to apply these patches promptly because notifications of patches are often incomplete and delayed. To address this issue, existing approaches employ deep-learning (DL) models to identify additional vulnerability patches by determining whether a code commit addresses a vulnerability. Nonetheless, these approaches suffer from low accuracy due to the imprecise context provided for the patches. To provide precise context for patches, we propose a multi-granularity slicing algorithm and an adaptive-expanding algorithm to accurately identify code related to the patches. Additionally, the precise context enables to design an iterative identification framework, CompVPD, which utilizes the human validation results, and substantially improve the effectiveness. We empirically compare CompVPD with four state-of-the-art/practice (SOTA) approaches in identifying vulnerability patches. The results demonstrate that CompVPD improves the F1 score by 20% compared to the best scores of the SOTA approaches. Additionally, CompVPD contributes to security practice by helping identify 20 vulnerability patches and 18 fixes for high-risk bugs from 2,500 recent code commits in five highly popular open-source projects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Highlighting Help GitHub Maintainers Track Security Fixes?

    cs.CR 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Token-level highlighting does not improve human accuracy in tracing vulnerability patches, though TfIdf-Highlight is more faithful to the retrieval model than LIME.

Pith tools