RECORD
Self-injective algebras under derived equivalences
Representation Theory · Submitted 6 Oct 2023
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The Nakayama permutations of two derived equivalent, self-injective Artin algebras are conjugate.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The Nakayama permutations of two derived equivalent, self-injective Artin algebras are conjugate. A different but elementary approach is given to showing that the weak symmetry and self-injectivity of finite-dimensional algebras over an arbitrary field are preserved under derived equivalences.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The Nakayama permutations of two derived equivalent, self-injective Artin algebras are conjugate. | result 0.99 | 0.66 | 0.72 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | A different but elementary approach is given to showing that the weak symmetry and self-injectivity of finite-dimensional algebras over an arbitrary field are preserved under derived equivalences. | contribution 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.19 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The Nakayama permutations of two derived equivalent, self-injective Artin algebras are conjugate. A different but elementary approach is given to showing that the weak symmetry and self-injectivity of finite-dimensional algebras over an arbitrary field are preserved under derived equivalences.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.