Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Unmasking Biases and Navigating Pitfalls in the Ophthalmic Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.04997 v1 pith:OGNAW2NM submitted 2023-10-08 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords datalifecyclemodelartificialevaluationintelligencepitfallsreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past two decades, exponential growth in data availability, computational power, and newly available modeling techniques has led to an expansion in interest, investment, and research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Ophthalmology is one of many fields that seek to benefit from AI given the advent of telemedicine screening programs and the use of ancillary imaging. However, before AI can be widely deployed, further work must be done to avoid the pitfalls within the AI lifecycle. This review article breaks down the AI lifecycle into seven steps: data collection; defining the model task; data pre-processing and labeling; model development; model evaluation and validation; deployment; and finally, post-deployment evaluation, monitoring, and system recalibration and delves into the risks for harm at each step and strategies for mitigating them.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools