Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Spectacular Post-Perihelion Tails of Bright Kreutz Sungrazers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.05320 v1 pith:7ZDIA4JY submitted 2023-10-09 astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords tailcomettailskreutzperiheliondustpost-perihelionsungrazer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A vast majority of bright comets between the late 2nd century and the early 18th century, moving in potentially Kreutz orbits according to Hasegawa & Nakano (2001), was first sighted between 2 and 16 days after perihelion, thanks to the spectacular tails that they were then displaying. In this paper I examine the basic properties of the post-perihelion tails of the three brightest Kreutz sungrazers of the 19th and 20th centuries -- the Great March Comet of 1843 (C/1843 D1), the Great September Comet of 1882 (C/1882 R1), and Ikeya-Seki (C/1965 S1). As the pre-perihelion tail of a sungrazer sublimates completely at perihelion, the development of its post-perihelion tail starts from scratch. In the early days after perihelion, the tail length grows rapidly on account of the plasma component. At some point the dust takes over, reaching a peak length weeks later. As the geocentric distance continues to increase and the surface brightness to decline, the tail's shortening sets in. The dust tails of Ikeya-Seki and the 1843 sungrazer contained grains subjected to solar radiation pressure accelerations not exceeding 0.6-0.7 the solar gravitational acceleration, the dust tail of the 1882 sungrazer was more complex. For weeks this comet appeared like a comet in a comet, a result of disintegration of a distant companion near perihelion. Evening Kreutz sungrazers are found to have longer tails than morning ones because of geometry. Other issues are discussed and extensive sets of tail data are provided.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Great Comets of 1843 and 1882 at Their Previous Return to Perihelion in the Twelfth Century: One Spectacular, the Other Dull

    astro-ph.EP 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Chinese comet of 1138, identified as the previous return of the 1882 sungrazer, would have been invisible in daylight and only appeared about a month after perihelion, while the 1106 comet's daylight sighting matc...

  2. New Insights into the Nature and Orbital Motion of Aristotle's Comet in 372 BC

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Aristotle's comet of 372 BC likely reached perihelion on January 20, and its observed path and 60-degree tail fit the orbit predicted for the Kreutz sungrazer progenitor.

Pith tools