Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Decoding the Threat Landscape : ChatGPT, FraudGPT, and WormGPT in Social Engineering Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.05595 v1 pith:O5UZK327 submitted 2023-10-09 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords generativeengineeringsocialattacksmodelschatgptcybersecurityfraudgpt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the ever-evolving realm of cybersecurity, the rise of generative AI models like ChatGPT, FraudGPT, and WormGPT has introduced both innovative solutions and unprecedented challenges. This research delves into the multifaceted applications of generative AI in social engineering attacks, offering insights into the evolving threat landscape using the blog mining technique. Generative AI models have revolutionized the field of cyberattacks, empowering malicious actors to craft convincing and personalized phishing lures, manipulate public opinion through deepfakes, and exploit human cognitive biases. These models, ChatGPT, FraudGPT, and WormGPT, have augmented existing threats and ushered in new dimensions of risk. From phishing campaigns that mimic trusted organizations to deepfake technology impersonating authoritative figures, we explore how generative AI amplifies the arsenal of cybercriminals. Furthermore, we shed light on the vulnerabilities that AI-driven social engineering exploits, including psychological manipulation, targeted phishing, and the crisis of authenticity. To counter these threats, we outline a range of strategies, including traditional security measures, AI-powered security solutions, and collaborative approaches in cybersecurity. We emphasize the importance of staying vigilant, fostering awareness, and strengthening regulations in the battle against AI-enhanced social engineering attacks. In an environment characterized by the rapid evolution of AI models and a lack of training data, defending against generative AI threats requires constant adaptation and the collective efforts of individuals, organizations, and governments. This research seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic interplay between generative AI and social engineering attacks, equipping stakeholders with the knowledge to navigate this intricate cybersecurity landscape.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SEAR: A Multimodal Dataset for Analyzing AR-LLM-Driven Social Engineering Behaviors

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SEAR is the first cited multimodal dataset of AR-plus-LLM social engineering, showing high self-reported trust and click intentions in a 60-person lab study.

  2. Automated Privacy Information Annotation in Large Language Model Interactions

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 249K-query English/Chinese dataset with 154K privacy phrases and a benchmark showing fine-tuned 1B-7B local models can detect privacy leaks, with 87.6% leakage accuracy but only 44.7% information-level F1.

  3. PhishKey: A Novel Centroid-Based Approach for Enhanced Phishing Detection Using Adaptive HTML Component Extraction

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    PhishKey combines CNN-based URL scoring with a centroid-filtered bag-of-words HTML classifier to detect phishing pages, reporting up to 98.70% F1 on one of four datasets.

Pith tools