Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Write What You Want: Applying Text-to-video Retrieval to Audiovisual Archives

Multimedia · Submitted 9 Oct 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This work filled the application gap by examining such text-to-video retrieval methods from an implementation point of view and proposed and verified a classifier-enhanced workflow to allow better results when dealing with in-situ queries that might have been different from the training dataset.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2310.05825 (version 1)
Pith IDCEYJTZQW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYuchen Yang. "Write What You Want: Applying Text-to-video Retrieval to Audiovisual Archives." arXiv:2310.05825 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/CEYJTZQW
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,473 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.57 · human participants 0.87 · controlled comparison 0.18 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.20 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Audiovisual (AV) archives, as an essential reservoir of our cultural assets, are suffering from the issue of accessibility. The complex nature of the medium itself made processing and interaction an open challenge still in the field of computer vision, multimodal learning, and human-computer interaction, as well as in culture and heritage. In recent years, with the raising of video retrieval tasks, methods in retrieving video content with natural language (text-to-video retrieval) gained quite some attention and have reached a performance level where real-world application is on the horizon. Appealing as it may sound, such methods focus on retrieving videos using plain visual-focused descriptions of what has happened in the video and finding videos such as instructions. It is too early to say such methods would be the new paradigms for accessing and encoding complex video content into high-dimensional data, but they are indeed innovative attempts and foundations to build future exploratory interfaces for AV archives (e.g. allow users to write stories and retrieve related snippets in the archive, or encoding video content at high-level for visualisation). This work filled the application gap by examining such text-to-video retrieval methods from an implementation point of view and proposed and verified a classifier-enhanced workflow to allow better results when dealing with in-situ queries that might have been different from the training dataset. Such a workflow is then applied to the real-world archive from T\'el\'evision Suisse Romande (RTS) to create a demo. At last, a human-centred evaluation is conducted to understand whether the text-to-video retrieval methods improve the overall experience of accessing AV archives.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Audiovisual (AV) archives, as an essential reservoir of our cultural assets, are suffering from the issue of accessibility. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 The complex nature of the medium itself made processing and interaction an open challenge still in the field of computer vision, multimodal learning, and human-computer interaction, as well as in culture and heritage. background 0.99 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 In recent years, with the raising of video retrieval tasks, methods in retrieving video content with natural language (text-to-video retrieval) gained quite some attention and have reached a performance level where real-world application is on the horizon. background 1.00 0.04 0.04 asserted 0.99
s3 Appealing as it may sound, such methods focus on retrieving videos using plain visual-focused descriptions of what has happened in the video and finding videos such as instructions. background 0.46 0.07 0.04 asserted 0.96
s4 It is too early to say such methods would be the new paradigms for accessing and encoding complex video content into high-dimensional data, but they are indeed innovative attempts and foundations to build future exploratory interfaces for AV archives (e.g. allow users to write stories and retrieve related snippets in the archive, or encoding video content at high-level for visualisation). background 0.27 0.11 0.18 hedged possibility 0.91
s5 This work filled the application gap by examining such text-to-video retrieval methods from an implementation point of view and proposed and verified a classifier-enhanced workflow to allow better results when dealing with in-situ queries that might have been different from the training dataset. contribution 0.99 0.95 0.36 asserted 1.00
s6 Such a workflow is then applied to the real-world archive from T\'el\'evision Suisse Romande (RTS) to create a demo. method 0.59 0.92 0.05 asserted 1.00
s7 At last, a human-centred evaluation is conducted to understand whether the text-to-video retrieval methods improve the overall experience of accessing AV archives. method 0.65 0.94 0.13 asserted 0.87

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.83 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Audiovisual (AV) archives, as an essential reservoir of our cultural assets, are suffering from the issue of accessibility. The complex nature of the medium itself made processing and interaction an open challenge still in the field of computer vision, multimodal learning, and human-computer interaction, as well as in culture and heritage. In recent years, with the raising of video retrieval tasks, methods in retrieving video content with natural language (text-to-video retrieval) gained quite some attention and have reached a performance level where real-world application is on the horizon. Appealing as it may sound, such methods focus on retrieving videos using plain visual-focused descriptions of what has happened in the video and finding videos such as instructions. It is too early to say such methods would be the new paradigms for accessing and encoding complex video content into high-dimensional data, but they are indeed innovative attempts and foundations to build future exploratory interfaces for AV archives (e.g. allow users to write stories and retrieve related snippets in the archive, or encoding video content at high-level for visualisation). This work filled the application gap by examining such text-to-video retrieval methods from an implementation point of view and proposed and verified a classifier-enhanced workflow to allow better results when dealing with in-situ queries that might have been different from the training dataset. Such a workflow is then applied to the real-world archive from T\'el\'evision Suisse Romande (RTS) to create a demo. At last, a human-centred evaluation is conducted to understand whether the text-to-video retrieval methods improve the overall experience of accessing AV archives.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • The entire MSR-VTT dataset is fed to the recently proposed Whisper [ref] model to obtain transcripts for each video clip, using the provided "small model" and following the implementation guides on hugging face[<https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-small>].

    Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision · Workflow implementation details · 1.00

  • Then, the participants are asked to vote between the overall experiences of the text-to-video retrieval and the traditional search interface based on the acute-eval metric [ref] , which emphasises the four key aspects when evaluating the performance and improvements of novel methods and systems: Engagingness, Interestingness, Humanness, and Informativeness (relevance).

    ACUTE-EVAL: Improved Dialogue Evaluation with Optimized Questions and Multi-turn Comparisons · Stage II · 0.97

Cites as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.