Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Predictable Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.06167 v3 pith:7BJHURSE submitted 2023-10-09 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords predictabilitypredictablechallengesecosystemsillustrateperformanceresearchsafety
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce the fundamental ideas and challenges of Predictable AI, a nascent research area that explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators (e.g., performance, safety) of present and future AI ecosystems. We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems, and thus should be prioritised over performance. We formally characterise predictability, explore its most relevant components, illustrate what can be predicted, describe alternative candidates for predictors, as well as the trade-offs between maximising validity and predictability. To illustrate these concepts, we bring an array of illustrative examples covering diverse ecosystem configurations. Predictable AI is related to other areas of technical and non-technical AI research, but have distinctive questions, hypotheses, techniques and challenges. This paper aims to elucidate them, calls for identifying paths towards a landscape of predictably valid AI systems and outlines the potential impact of this emergent field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. 11Plus-Bench: Demystifying Multimodal LLM Spatial Reasoning with Cognitive-Inspired Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new spatial reasoning benchmark shows current multimodal models lag humans badly and lack the item-level predictability humans show.

  2. Predicting Performance of Symbolic and Prompt Programs with Examples

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Proposes RAP, a retrieval-based approximate prior method, to predict performance of symbolic programs and LLM prompts on new tasks using a Bernoulli model and corpus-derived performance distributions.

Pith tools