REVIEW 1 cited by
Near and Far Field Model Mismatch: Implications on 6G Communications, Localization, and Sensing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The upcoming 6G technology is expected to operate in near-field (NF) radiating conditions thanks to high-frequency and electrically large antenna arrays. Although several studies have already addressed this possibility, it is worth noting that NF models introduce higher complexity, the justification for which is not always evident in terms of performance improvements. This article investigates the implications of the mismatch between NF and far-field (FF) models concerning communication, localization, and sensing systems. Such disparity can lead to a degradation of performance metrics such as sensing and localization accuracy and communication efficiency. By exploring the effects of mismatches between NF and FF models, this study seeks to revolve around the challenges faced by system designers, offering insights about the balance between model accuracy and achievable performance. Finally, we conduct a numerical performance analysis to verify the impact of the mismatch between NF and FF models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Impact of Model Mismatch on DOA Estimation with MUSIC: Near-Field and Far-Field
Using the far-field model in the near-field under-estimates MUSIC DOA errors, while near-field MUSIC estimates range accurately only below the Fraunhofer distance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.