Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improved Analysis of Sparse Linear Regression in Local Differential Privacy Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07367 v1 pith:NKWQ6UQD submitted 2023-10-11 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords sqrtmodelboundepsilonsparsefraclocalproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we revisit the problem of sparse linear regression in the local differential privacy (LDP) model. Existing research in the non-interactive and sequentially local models has focused on obtaining the lower bounds for the case where the underlying parameter is $1$-sparse, and extending such bounds to the more general $k$-sparse case has proven to be challenging. Moreover, it is unclear whether efficient non-interactive LDP (NLDP) algorithms exist. To address these issues, we first consider the problem in the $\epsilon$ non-interactive LDP model and provide a lower bound of $\Omega(\frac{\sqrt{dk\log d}}{\sqrt{n}\epsilon})$ on the $\ell_2$-norm estimation error for sub-Gaussian data, where $n$ is the sample size and $d$ is the dimension of the space. We propose an innovative NLDP algorithm, the very first of its kind for the problem. As a remarkable outcome, this algorithm also yields a novel and highly efficient estimator as a valuable by-product. Our algorithm achieves an upper bound of $\tilde{O}({\frac{d\sqrt{k}}{\sqrt{n}\epsilon}})$ for the estimation error when the data is sub-Gaussian, which can be further improved by a factor of $O(\sqrt{d})$ if the server has additional public but unlabeled data. For the sequentially interactive LDP model, we show a similar lower bound of $\Omega({\frac{\sqrt{dk}}{\sqrt{n}\epsilon}})$. As for the upper bound, we rectify a previous method and show that it is possible to achieve a bound of $\tilde{O}(\frac{k\sqrt{d}}{\sqrt{n}\epsilon})$. Our findings reveal fundamental differences between the non-private case, central DP model, and local DP model in the sparse linear regression problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Van Trees Lower Bound for Fully Interactive Differentially Private Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Under clientwise sample-level zCDP, the Fisher information of any fully interactive public federated transcript contracts to a sum of per-client privacy-vs-sample terms, yielding matching minimax rates for mean, linea...

  2. Differentially Private Sparse Linear Regression with Heavy-tailed Responses

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    New differentially private iterative hard thresholding algorithms for high-dimensional sparse linear regression with heavy-tailed responses, with a claimed bound for the l1 variant that does not depend on the tail index.

Pith tools