REVIEW 5 cited by
Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis, Inference and Explanation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models are a form of artificial intelligence systems whose primary knowledge consists of the statistical patterns, semantic relationships, and syntactical structures of language1. Despite their limited forms of "knowledge", these systems are adept at numerous complex tasks including creative writing, storytelling, translation, question-answering, summarization, and computer code generation. However, they have yet to demonstrate advanced applications in natural science. Here we show how large language models can perform scientific synthesis, inference, and explanation. We present a method for using general-purpose large language models to make inferences from scientific datasets of the form usually associated with special-purpose machine learning algorithms. We show that the large language model can augment this "knowledge" by synthesizing from the scientific literature. When a conventional machine learning system is augmented with this synthesized and inferred knowledge it can outperform the current state of the art across a range of benchmark tasks for predicting molecular properties. This approach has the further advantage that the large language model can explain the machine learning system's predictions. We anticipate that our framework will open new avenues for AI to accelerate the pace of scientific discovery.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review
TreeReview builds a dynamic tree of review questions, answers leaves with retrieved paper chunks, and aggregates upward to produce reviews that outperform baselines while cutting token use by 80%.
-
Normative Conflicts and Shallow AI Alignment
A philosophical argument that preference fine-tuning produces shallow alignment, plus a new 'thought injection' attack that exploits reasoning traces in LLMs.
-
VASP Agent: An Agentic Framework for Autonomous First-principles Calculations
An LLM-driven agent with predefined VASP workflows and parameter-checking tools completes DFT simulation tasks more reliably and accurately than standalone LLMs, with a new 80-task benchmark.
-
Accelerating Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Convergence using Pre-trained Large Language Models as Tutors With Advice Reusing
LLM tutoring modestly accelerates RL convergence on average, with advice reuse saving wall-clock time but reducing stability.
-
From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines
LLMs accelerate research workflows from idea generation to writing but introduce challenges like hallucination, bias, opacity, and ten systemic risks requiring new governance frameworks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.