REVIEW
Methods for Averaging Spectral Line Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The ideal spectral averaging method depends on one's science goals and the available information about one's data. Including low-quality data in the average can decrease the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which may necessitate an optimization method or a consideration of different weighting schemes. Here, we explore a variety of spectral averaging methods. We investigate the use of three weighting schemes during averaging: weighting by the signal divided by the variance ("intensity-noise weighting"), weighting by the inverse of the variance ("noise weighting"), and uniform weighting. Whereas for intensity-noise weighting the SNR is maximized when all spectra are averaged, for noise and uniform weighting we find that averaging the 35-45% of spectra with the highest SNR results in the highest SNR average spectrum. With this intensity cutoff, the average spectrum with noise or uniform weighting has ~95% of the intensity of the spectrum created from intensity-noise weighting. We apply our spectral averaging methods to GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas (GDIGS) hydrogen radio recombination line (RRL) data to determine the ionic abundance ratio, y+, and discuss future applications of the methodology.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.