pith. sign in

arxiv: 2310.09396 · v2 · submitted 2023-10-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas

In situ subwavelength microscopy of ultracold atoms using dressed excited states

Romain Veyron , Jean-Baptiste G\'erent , Guillaume Baclet , Vincent Mancois , Philippe Bouyer , Simon Bernon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords subwavelength imagingultracold atomsthree-level systempopulation transferoptical latticequantum gas microscopydressed states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser-driven interactions in a three-level system produce ground-state population transfer on scales far below the optical resolution limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a method to image ultracold atoms at subwavelength resolution by using laser coupling between excited states to transfer population between hyperfine ground states over distances much smaller than the wavelength of light. This transfer occurs in a three-level atomic system and can be measured either in a fast strong-imaging regime that freezes dynamics or, counter-intuitively, in a slow weak-imaging regime. Experiments on a thermal gas confirm quantitative agreement with an analytical model, while a separate demonstration shows the weak regime can isolate and resolve a 30 nm wavefunction extracted from a one-dimensional optical lattice. A dissipation-inclusive formalism supplies validity criteria that apply to both regimes and to related subwavelength techniques.

Core claim

Laser-driven population transfer engineered between dressed excited states in a three-level system creates spatially selective hyperfine ground-state transfer on scales much smaller than the optical resolution; this enables subwavelength imaging in the strong regime with a thermal ensemble and, in the weak regime, the selection and resolution of a 30 nm wavefunction from a tightly confined lattice, with both regimes supported by an analytical model and validity criteria derived from a general dissipation formalism.

What carries the argument

Dressed excited states in a three-level system that induce hyperfine ground-state population transfer on sub-optical scales.

If this is right

  • Subwavelength resolution becomes accessible in both rapid and slow imaging regimes without requiring changes to the optical setup.
  • A 30 nm wavefunction can be selectively addressed and imaged inside a one-dimensional optical lattice.
  • Validity criteria derived from the dissipation formalism can be applied to other subwavelength imaging protocols.
  • Quantitative agreement between experiment and the fully analytical model holds for thermal ensembles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same three-level transfer mechanism could be tested on other atomic species or molecules to check transfer of the subwavelength property.
  • Combining the weak-regime selection with existing lattice techniques might allow direct imaging of ground-state wavefunctions narrower than current diffraction limits.
  • The formalism's inclusion of dissipation suggests it could guide extensions to systems with stronger spontaneous emission.

Load-bearing premise

The laser interaction creates the required population transfer over distances much smaller than the imaging resolution while any induced dynamics remain negligible during the measurement.

What would settle it

If the spatial width of the transferred population in the thermal-gas experiment deviates from the analytical prediction by more than the stated experimental uncertainty, the subwavelength claim fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2310.09396 by Guillaume Baclet, Jean-Baptiste G\'erent, Philippe Bouyer, Romain Veyron, Simon Bernon, Vincent Mancois.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Three fine structure states of 87Rb: the ground state 5 2S1/2 and the two excited states 5 2P3/2 and 4 2D5/2. (b) A three-level system with an optically dressed excited state using a 1529 nm lattice probed with a repumper at a detuning ∆780 and imaged on a cycling transition. where Γ/2π = 6.066 MHz and s0 = I780/Isat,rep are re￾spectively the natural linewidth and the on-resonance saturation parameter … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Optical setup for the generation of the 1529 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Atom number (left axis) per unit of lattice period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Optical setup for the generation of the 1529 nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a), (b), (c) Wavepacket density imaging by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 87Rb D2 transition hyperfine structure (5 2S1/2 to 5 2P3/2) and its approximation as a 3LS for the repumper transition and as a 2LS for the imaging transition. adiabatic approximation which assumes that the optical coherences are always in equilibrium with respect to the populations (ρ˙12′ ≈ 0). This regime is valid for thermal atoms if their displacement over a time 1/Γ is much smaller than the target sub… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulation of the evolution of the wavefunction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Projection along the x-axis of normalized atom numbers after repumping atoms in the 1064 nm lattice with ∆780 = 0, s0 = 0.02 and t = 8 µs in a modulation of U5P,0 = 16Γ as a function the camera axis (y-axis) and the relative phase Φ0 (x-axis) between the two lattices. mv˙ = F0. After an average time in the excited state on the order of 1/Γ, the atoms transferred into |2⟩ have on average a velocity gain of … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematics of the projection position shift of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we implement a new method for imaging ultracold atoms with subwavelength resolution capabilities and determine its regime of validity. It uses the laser driven interaction between excited states to engineer hyperfine ground state population transfer in a three-level system on scales much smaller than the optical resolution. Subwavelength imaging of a quantum gas is atypical in the sense that the measurement itself perturbs the dynamics of the system. To avoid induced dynamics affecting the measurement, one usually measures "rapidly" the wavefunction in a so-called strong imaging regime. We experimentally illustrate this regime using a thermal gas ensemble, and demonstrate subwavelength resolution in quantitative agreement with a fully analytical model. Additionally, we show that, counter-intuitively, the opposite weak imaging regime can also be exploited to reach subwavelength resolution. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate that this regime is a robust solution to select and spatially resolve a 30 nm wide wavefunction, which was created and singled out from a tightly confined 1D optical lattice. Using a general dissipation-included formalism, we derive validity criteria for both regimes. The formalism is applicable to other subwavelength methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a method for in-situ subwavelength imaging of ultracold atoms that engineers hyperfine ground-state population transfer via laser-driven interactions between dressed excited states in a three-level system. The transfer occurs on scales much smaller than the optical resolution. The authors experimentally demonstrate quantitative agreement with a fully analytical model in the strong imaging regime using a thermal gas ensemble, show that the weak imaging regime can also achieve subwavelength resolution, and provide a proof-of-concept resolution of a 30 nm wavefunction selected from a 1D optical lattice. A dissipation-included formalism is used to derive validity criteria for both regimes, claimed to be applicable more generally.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold, the work offers a new route to subwavelength in-situ microscopy of quantum gases that avoids some limitations of existing techniques. The combination of a parameter-free analytical model with direct experimental comparison, plus the general validity criteria derived from the dissipation formalism, would constitute a solid contribution to ultracold-atom imaging methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and strong-imaging-regime description] The load-bearing assumption for the strong imaging regime (that induced dynamics remain frozen during the measurement) is stated in the abstract and the paragraph describing the regime, but no explicit comparison of the imaging duration against the relevant Rabi frequencies or decay rates of the three-level dressed system is provided. Without this or an independent experimental check (e.g., varying imaging time and confirming profile invariance), the reported quantitative agreement with the analytical model could be consistent with partial averaging rather than true subwavelength capture of the unperturbed wavefunction.
  2. [Weak imaging regime and 30 nm proof-of-concept section] For the weak-imaging-regime proof-of-concept, the claim that the 30 nm wavefunction is robustly selected and spatially resolved from the 1D lattice (abstract) requires showing that the selection criterion itself does not introduce spatial averaging or bias on the same scale; the manuscript should clarify in the relevant experimental section how the lattice confinement and imaging parameters ensure the reported width is not an artifact of the weak-regime dynamics.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the three-level system (states, detunings, Rabi frequencies) should be defined once in a dedicated subsection or figure caption and used consistently thereafter.
  2. Error bars, fit residuals, and any post-selection criteria on the thermal-gas data should be stated explicitly when claiming quantitative agreement with the analytical model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and strong-imaging-regime description] The load-bearing assumption for the strong imaging regime (that induced dynamics remain frozen during the measurement) is stated in the abstract and the paragraph describing the regime, but no explicit comparison of the imaging duration against the relevant Rabi frequencies or decay rates of the three-level dressed system is provided. Without this or an independent experimental check (e.g., varying imaging time and confirming profile invariance), the reported quantitative agreement with the analytical model could be consistent with partial averaging rather than true subwavelength capture of the unperturbed wavefunction.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison of imaging duration against the Rabi frequencies and decay rates would strengthen the presentation of the strong imaging regime. In the revised manuscript we will add this comparison, using the dissipation-included formalism already developed in the paper to show that the imaging time is short compared to the relevant timescales. The quantitative, parameter-free agreement between experiment and the analytical model (which assumes frozen dynamics) provides supporting evidence that partial averaging is not occurring, but we acknowledge that varying imaging time would constitute an independent check; our existing data set does not include such a systematic variation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Weak imaging regime and 30 nm proof-of-concept section] For the weak-imaging-regime proof-of-concept, the claim that the 30 nm wavefunction is robustly selected and spatially resolved from the 1D lattice (abstract) requires showing that the selection criterion itself does not introduce spatial averaging or bias on the same scale; the manuscript should clarify in the relevant experimental section how the lattice confinement and imaging parameters ensure the reported width is not an artifact of the weak-regime dynamics.

    Authors: We will revise the experimental section describing the weak-imaging-regime proof-of-concept to explicitly detail how the 1D lattice confinement (whose length scale is substantially smaller than 30 nm) combined with the chosen imaging parameters ensures that the selection criterion does not introduce spatial averaging or bias at the reported scale. The demonstration that a 30 nm feature is resolved, together with the general validity criteria derived from the dissipation formalism, indicates that the width is not an artifact, but we agree that additional clarification on this point is warranted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: fully analytical model derived independently of experiment

full rationale

The paper derives validity criteria for strong and weak imaging regimes from a general dissipation-included formalism applied to a three-level dressed system. It reports quantitative agreement between this fully analytical model and experimental data on a thermal ensemble, plus a proof-of-concept for the weak regime on a 30 nm wavefunction. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes imported from prior author work; the central claims rest on the independent derivation and direct experimental comparison rather than tautological renaming or forced predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full text, methods section, and citations unavailable, limiting identification of free parameters or additional axioms.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Three-level system approximation for laser-driven population transfer between hyperfine ground states
    Method relies on this interaction occurring on subwavelength scales (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5749 in / 1278 out tokens · 30403 ms · 2026-05-24T06:32:01.573346+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    strong", rather than

    ≫ 1, (8) wherewehaveshapedtheequationtoemphasizetheen- ergy ratio of pumping strengthℏκ0 over localization re- coil ℏ2/(2mX2 0). One should note that this criteria does not restrict the imaging time but rather constrains the imaging strength κ0, hence the name "strong", rather than "fast", imaging regime. The strong imaging regime is experimentally demon-...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In Appendix C5, we verified that the weak imaging regime applies by solving numerically the Schrödinger Eq. (6). Such simulation does not account for the doubly dressed state contribution to the potential [7] which was shown, in Appendix D, to have a negligible effect for the considered experimental realisation. The corresponding atomic densities are show...

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    We focus on slow dynamics (Γt ≫ 1) by applying the Figure 7

    Temporal dynamics The point spread function (PSF), defined in our sys- tem as the spatially dependent population transfer rate to |2⟩ (κ(x)) is derived from the time evolution of the density matrix ρ of the 3LS in abscence of spatial dy- namics [30]. We focus on slow dynamics (Γt ≫ 1) by applying the Figure 7. 87Rb D2 transition hyperfine structure (52S1/...

    work page

  4. [4]

    It corresponds to a high kinetic energy term that influences the imaging dynamics it- self

    Spatio-temporal dynamics The strong localization of particles induced by the imaging process translates in rapid spatial variation of the density profile. It corresponds to a high kinetic energy term that influences the imaging dynamics it- self. To phenomenologically accounts for this effect, we model the depumping from state|1⟩by a non-Hermitian loss te...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This generates a velocity spread∆v

    Strong imaging criteria In the strong imaging regime, we imprint a dip in Ψ(x, t). This generates a velocity spread∆v. In that case, one should satisfy∆v.timaging ≪ ∆x, where∆x is the position spread (STD). In the main text, we have discussed the simple and analytical case of a Gaussian dip that satisfies the Heisenberg equality. The opposite limit is rep...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (C10) 12 where the factor of 2 on the right hand side comes from the dissipation term κ(ˆx)/2 in the Schrödinger equa- tion

    Weak imaging criteria The Schrödinger equation (C6) has an adiabatic evo- lution with respect to the motional states of the har- monic oscillator if the coupling strength satisfies: | ⟨ϕn| κ(ˆx) |ϕ0⟩ | ≪ 2(En − E0) ℏ . (C10) 12 where the factor of 2 on the right hand side comes from the dissipation term κ(ˆx)/2 in the Schrödinger equa- tion. It can be exp...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Numerical simulation of the evolution The diabatic and adiabatic behavior of the wavefunc- tion expected respectively in the strong and weak imag- ing regime can be validated by numerical simulations of Eq. (C6). For that purpose, using imaginary time method, we have derived the ground and few first eigen- state wavefunctions of ˆH0. Starting from the gro...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Schäfer, T

    F. Schäfer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Tools for quantum simulation with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 411 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kanász-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi-Hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature545, 462 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Koepsell, S

    J. Koepsell, S. Hirthe, D. Bourgund, P. Sompet, J. Vijayan, G. Salomon, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Ro- bust Bilayer Charge Pumping for Spin- and Density- Resolved Quantum Gas Microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 010403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Nascimbene, N

    S. Nascimbene, N. Goldman, N. R. Cooper, and J. Dal- ibard, Dynamic Optical Lattices of Subwavelength Spacing for Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 140401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    T.-C. Tsui, Y. Wang, S. Subhankar, J. V. Porto, and S. L. Rolston, Realization of a stroboscopic optical lat- tice for cold atoms with subwavelength spacing, Physi- cal Review A101, 041603(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    R. P. Anderson, D. Trypogeorgos, A. Valdés-Curiel, Q.- Y. Liang, J. Tao, M. Zhao, T. Andrijauskas, G. Juzeli- unas, and I. B. Spielman, Realization of a deeply sub- wavelength adiabatic optical lattice, Physical Review Research 2, 013149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Bellouvet, C

    M. Bellouvet, C. Busquet, J. Zhang, P. Lalanne, P. Bouyer, and S. Bernon, Doubly dressed states for near-field trapping and subwavelength lattice structur- ing, Phys. Rev. A98, 023429 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    A. G. Godin, B. Lounis, and L. Cognet, Super- resolution microscopy approaches for live cell imaging, Biophys. J.107, 1777 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    M. G. L. Gustafsson, Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy, Journal of Microscopy198, 82 (2000)

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    S. W. Hell and J. Wichmann, Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated- emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy, Opt. Lett. 19, 780 (1994)

    work page 1994

  18. [18]

    M. J. Rust, M. Bates, and X. Zhuang, Sub-diffraction- limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction mi- croscopy (STORM), Nature Methods3, 793 (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Weitenberg, M

    C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, J. F. Sherson, M. Cheneau, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single- spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator, Nature 471, 319 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Alberti, C

    A. Alberti, C. Robens, W. Alt, S. Brakhane, M. Karski, R. Reimann, A. Widera, and D. Meschede, Super- resolution microscopy of single atoms in optical lattices, New J. Phys.18, 053010 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Asteria, H

    L. Asteria, H. P. Zahn, M. N. Kosch, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Quantum gas magnifier for sub-lattice- resolved imaging of 3d quantum systems, Nature599, 571–575 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    McDonald, J

    M. McDonald, J. Trisnadi, K.-X. Yao, and C. Chin, Su- perresolution Microscopy of Cold Atoms in an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. X9, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Subhankar, Y

    S. Subhankar, Y. Wang, T.-C. Tsui, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, Nanoscale Atomic Density Microscopy, Physical Review X9, 021002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Veyron, V

    R. Veyron, V. Mancois, J.-B. Gerent, G. Baclet, P. Bouyer, and S. Bernon, Quantitative absorption imaging: The role of incoherent multiple scattering in thesaturatingregime,Phys.Rev.Res. 4,033033(2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Keeling and N

    J. Keeling and N. G. Berloff, Spontaneous rotating vor- tex lattices in a pumped decaying condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 250401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    I. G. Savenko, T. C. H. Liew, and I. A. Shelykh, Stochastic gross-pitaevskii equation for the dynamical thermalization of bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    M. P. Sierra J., Kasimov A. and W. R.-M., On the gross–pitaevskii equation with pumping and decay: Stationary states and their stability, J. Nonlinear Sci 25, 709–739 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Ben Dahan, E

    M. Ben Dahan, E. Peik, J. Reichel, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, Bloch oscillations of atoms in an optical potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4508 (1996)

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    Whiting, An empirical approximation to the voigt profile, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Ra- diative Transfer8, 1379 (1968)

    E. Whiting, An empirical approximation to the voigt profile, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Ra- diative Transfer8, 1379 (1968)

    work page 1968

  30. [30]

    Y.-J. Lin, A. R. Perry, R. L. Compton, I. B. Spiel- man, and J. V. Porto, Rapid production of87Rb Bose- Einstein condensates in a combined magnetic and opti- cal potential, Phys. Rev. A79, 063631 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    X. Li, F. Zhou, M. Ke, P. Xu, X.-D. He, J. Wang, and M.-S. Zhan, High-resolution ex vacuo objec- tive for cold atom experiments, Appl. Opt. 57, 10.1364/AO.57.007584 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.57.007584 2018

  32. [32]

    Veyron, V

    R. Veyron, V. Mancois, J. B. Gerent, G. Baclet, P. Bouyer, and S. Bernon, Effective two-level approxi- mation of a multilevel system driven by coherent and incoherent fields, Phys. Rev. A105, 043105 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Gadway, D

    B. Gadway, D. Pertot, R. Reimann, M. G. Cohen, and D. Schneble, Analysis of Kapitza-Dirac diffraction pat- ternsbeyondtheRaman-Nathregime,Opt.Express 17, 19173 (2009). 17

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Browaeys, D

    J.H.Denschlag, J.E.Simsarian, H.Häffner, C.McKen- zie, A. Browaeys, D. Cho, K. Helmerson, S. L. Rolston, and W. D. Phillips, A Bose-Einstein condensate in an optical lattice, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.35, 3095 (2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Fuhrmanek, R

    A. Fuhrmanek, R. Bourgain, Y. R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Free-space lossless state detection of a sin- gle trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 133003 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Shibata, R

    K. Shibata, R. Yamamoto, Y. Seki, and Y. Takahashi, Optical spectral imaging of a single layer of a quantum gas with an ultranarrow optical transition, Physical Re- view A89, 031601(R) (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    D. A. Steck, Quantum and atom optics (2019), available online at http://steck.us/teaching, revision 0.12.6

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Arora and B

    B. Arora and B. K. Sahoo, State-insensitive trapping of Rb atoms: Linearly versus circularly polarized light, Physical Review A99, 049901(E) (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Arora, M

    B. Arora, M. S. Safronova, and C. W. Clark, Magic wavelengths for the np-ns transitions in alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A76, 052509 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Bertoldi, S

    A. Bertoldi, S. Bernon, T. Vanderbruggen, A. Landra- gin, and P. Bouyer, In situ characterization of an opti- cal cavity using atomic light shift, Opt. Lett.35, 3769 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    D. A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D line data (2001), available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata

    work page 2001