REVIEW 2 cited by
A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose a novel zero-shot document ranking approach based on Large Language Models (LLMs): the Setwise prompting approach. Our approach complements existing prompting approaches for LLM-based zero-shot ranking: Pointwise, Pairwise, and Listwise. Through the first-of-its-kind comparative evaluation within a consistent experimental framework and considering factors like model size, token consumption, latency, among others, we show that existing approaches are inherently characterised by trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency. We find that while Pointwise approaches score high on efficiency, they suffer from poor effectiveness. Conversely, Pairwise approaches demonstrate superior effectiveness but incur high computational overhead. Our Setwise approach, instead, reduces the number of LLM inferences and the amount of prompt token consumption during the ranking procedure, compared to previous methods. This significantly improves the efficiency of LLM-based zero-shot ranking, while also retaining high zero-shot ranking effectiveness. We make our code and results publicly available at \url{https://github.com/ielab/llm-rankers}.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Reranking with Compressed Document Representation
A reranker trained on 8-token PISCO document embeddings plus a short query achieves near-identical nDCG@10 to full-text rerankers on BeIR and TREC-DL while running up to 16x faster.
-
Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments
Using a fine-tuned 3B LLM to generate millions of textual relevance labels for App Store search improves the ranker's behavioral/textual Pareto frontier and lifts conversion by 0.24%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.