Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Sharp Fourier Inequality and the Epanechnikov Kernel

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09713 v1 pith:PLFW7WED submitted 2023-10-15 math.CA math.STstat.TH

classification math.CAmath.STstat.TH
keywords mathbbkernelepanechnikovfourierminimizingproblemthereanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider functions $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{R}$ and kernels $u: \{-n, \cdots, n\} \to \mathbb{R}$ normalized by $\sum_{\ell = -n}^{n} u(\ell) = 1$, making the convolution $u \ast f$ a "smoother" local average of $f$. We identify which choice of $u$ most effectively smooths the second derivative in the following sense. For each $u$, basic Fourier analysis implies there is a constant $C(u)$ so $\|\Delta(u \ast f)\|_{\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})} \leq C(u)\|f\|_{\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})}$ for all $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{R}$. By compactness, there is some $u$ that minimizes $C(u)$ and in this paper, we find explicit expressions for both this minimal $C(u)$ and the minimizing kernel $u$ for every $n$. The minimizing kernel is remarkably close to the Epanechnikov kernel in Statistics. This solves a problem of Kravitz-Steinerberger and an extremal problem for polynomials is solved as a byproduct.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptable Embeddings Network (AEN)

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AEN compares a statement embedding against per-dimension kernel density estimates of condition token embeddings, reporting F1 0.74 on synthetic data with roughly 16x fewer FLOPs than a 3B-parameter LLM.

Pith tools