REVIEW 3 cited by
Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has revolutionized general natural language preprocessing (NLP) tasks. However, their expertise in the financial domain lacks a comprehensive evaluation. To assess the ability of LLMs to solve financial NLP tasks, we present FinLMEval, a framework for Financial Language Model Evaluation, comprising nine datasets designed to evaluate the performance of language models. This study compares the performance of encoder-only language models and the decoder-only language models. Our findings reveal that while some decoder-only LLMs demonstrate notable performance across most financial tasks via zero-shot prompting, they generally lag behind the fine-tuned expert models, especially when dealing with proprietary datasets. We hope this study provides foundation evaluations for continuing efforts to build more advanced LLMs in the financial domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LaQual: An Automated Framework for LLM App Quality Evaluation
LaQual automates LLM app-store quality evaluation through scenario classification, static indicator filtering, and LLM-generated dynamic metrics, with Spearman correlations of about 0.6 against human ratings.
-
Interpretable LLMs for Credit Risk: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy
A systematic review and taxonomy that organizes LLM-based credit risk research by model architecture, data modality, explainability mechanism, and application domain.
-
Assessing the Capabilities and Limitations of FinGPT Model in Financial NLP Applications
FinGPT matches GPT-4 on financial sentiment and headline classification, lags on QA and NER, and shows a bullish bias in stock movement prediction.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.