REVIEW 3 cited by
Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While recent studies have looked into the abilities of large language models in various benchmark tasks, including question generation, reading comprehension, multilingual and etc, there have been few studies looking into the controllability of large language models on generation tasks. We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models. We conclude that **large language models struggle at meeting fine-grained hard constraints**.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond In-Context Learning: Aligning Long-form Generation of Large Language Models via Task-Inherent Attribute Guidelines
LongGuide automatically learns task-specific quality and length guidelines from small training sets, significantly improving LLM long-form generation.
-
Beyond Pass or Fail: Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking of Foundation Models for Goal-based Mobile UI Navigation
Sphinx, a multi-dimensional UI-navigation benchmark, shows current foundation models score low on goal understanding, planning, grounding, instruction following, and end-to-end success, with zero successes on industri...
-
LCTG Bench: LLM Controlled Text Generation Benchmark
LCTG Bench is a new Japanese benchmark that scores LLM controllability on format, character count, keyword, and prohibited-word constraints across summarization, ad text, and pros/cons generation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.