Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Test-time Augmentation for Factual Probing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.17121 v1 pith:QPIQVLXH submitted 2023-10-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelfactualprobingpromptpromptsaccuracyaugmentationchanges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Factual probing is a method that uses prompts to test if a language model "knows" certain world knowledge facts. A problem in factual probing is that small changes to the prompt can lead to large changes in model output. Previous work aimed to alleviate this problem by optimizing prompts via text mining or fine-tuning. However, such approaches are relation-specific and do not generalize to unseen relation types. Here, we propose to use test-time augmentation (TTA) as a relation-agnostic method for reducing sensitivity to prompt variations by automatically augmenting and ensembling prompts at test time. Experiments show improved model calibration, i.e., with TTA, model confidence better reflects prediction accuracy. Improvements in prediction accuracy are observed for some models, but for other models, TTA leads to degradation. Error analysis identifies the difficulty of producing high-quality prompt variations as the main challenge for TTA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Test-Time Augmentation for LLMs: When Input Diversity Beats Output Diversity at Matched Compute

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For mid-tier LLMs, generating paraphrased versions of an input and majority voting over answers converts inference budget into accuracy more efficiently than self-consistency sampling.

Pith tools