Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Bayesian Stability Zoo

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18428 v2 pith:GAAMS7IL submitted 2023-10-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords stabilitydefinitionslearningbayesiandifferentialprivacytheoryalong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that many definitions of stability found in the learning theory literature are equivalent to one another. We distinguish between two families of definitions of stability: distribution-dependent and distribution-independent Bayesian stability. Within each family, we establish equivalences between various definitions, encompassing approximate differential privacy, pure differential privacy, replicability, global stability, perfect generalization, TV stability, mutual information stability, KL-divergence stability, and R\'enyi-divergence stability. Along the way, we prove boosting results that enable the amplification of the stability of a learning rule. This work is a step towards a more systematic taxonomy of stability notions in learning theory, which can promote clarity and an improved understanding of an array of stability concepts that have emerged in recent years.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Replicable Distribution Testing

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A new random-walk framework yields near-optimal sample complexity bounds for replicable uniformity testing (settling an open question) and for replicable closeness testing.

Pith tools