REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchingmaking Large Langage Models in Biomedical Triple Extraction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Biomedical triple extraction systems aim to automatically extract biomedical entities and relations between entities. The exploration of applying large language models (LLM) to triple extraction is still relatively unexplored. In this work, we mainly focus on sentence-level biomedical triple extraction. Furthermore, the absence of a high-quality biomedical triple extraction dataset impedes the progress in developing robust triple extraction systems. To address these challenges, initially, we compare the performance of various large language models. Additionally, we present GIT, an expert-annotated biomedical triple extraction dataset that covers a wider range of relation types.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Towards Better Multi-task Learning: A Framework for Optimizing Dataset Combinations in Large Language Models
A neural-network-guided iterative search over dataset combinations is claimed to improve multi-task LLM performance, but the paper's own figures and text contradict each other and no baselines or error bars are provided.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.