Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large Language Models Are Better Adversaries: Exploring Generative Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks Against Text Classifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18603 v1 pith:KWGZMEQE submitted 2023-10-28 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords attacksbackdoortrainingllmbkdattackclean-labeleffectivenessexamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Backdoor attacks manipulate model predictions by inserting innocuous triggers into training and test data. We focus on more realistic and more challenging clean-label attacks where the adversarial training examples are correctly labeled. Our attack, LLMBkd, leverages language models to automatically insert diverse style-based triggers into texts. We also propose a poison selection technique to improve the effectiveness of both LLMBkd as well as existing textual backdoor attacks. Lastly, we describe REACT, a baseline defense to mitigate backdoor attacks via antidote training examples. Our evaluations demonstrate LLMBkd's effectiveness and efficiency, where we consistently achieve high attack success rates across a wide range of styles with little effort and no model training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Systematic Review of Poisoning Attacks Against Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review that organizes 65 LLM poisoning papers into a threat model with four attack specifications and generalized metrics.

Pith tools