REVIEW 1 cited by
Adapting Frechet Audio Distance for Generative Music Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Adapting Frechet Audio Distance for Generative Music Evaluation
read the original abstract
The growing popularity of generative music models underlines the need for perceptually relevant, objective music quality metrics. The Frechet Audio Distance (FAD) is commonly used for this purpose even though its correlation with perceptual quality is understudied. We show that FAD performance may be hampered by sample size bias, poor choice of audio embeddings, or the use of biased or low-quality reference sets. We propose reducing sample size bias by extrapolating scores towards an infinite sample size. Through comparisons with MusicCaps labels and a listening test we identify audio embeddings and music reference sets that yield FAD scores well-correlated with acoustic and musical quality. Our results suggest that per-song FAD can be useful to identify outlier samples and predict perceptual quality for a range of music sets and generative models. Finally, we release a toolkit that allows adapting FAD for generative music evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Name-Free Gap: Policy-Aware Stylistic Control in Music Generation
Word-based style descriptors generated by an LLM can shift MusicGen outputs toward a target artist's sound almost as much as using the artist's name, defining a name-free gap.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.