Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.03157 v2 pith:VTGICWVG submitted 2023-11-06 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords gptunerknowledgetuningdatabasedbmsoptimizationknobknobs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern database management systems (DBMS) expose hundreds of configurable knobs to control system behaviours. Determining the appropriate values for these knobs to improve DBMS performance is a long-standing problem in the database community. As there is an increasing number of knobs to tune and each knob could be in continuous or categorical values, manual tuning becomes impractical. Recently, automatic tuning systems using machine learning methods have shown great potentials. However, existing approaches still incur significant tuning costs or only yield sub-optimal performance. This is because they either ignore the extensive domain knowledge available (e.g., DBMS manuals and forum discussions) and only rely on the runtime feedback of benchmark evaluations to guide the optimization, or they utilize the domain knowledge in a limited way. Hence, we propose GPTuner, a manual-reading database tuning system. Firstly, we develop a Large Language Model (LLM)-based pipeline to collect and refine heterogeneous knowledge, and propose a prompt ensemble algorithm to unify a structured view of the refined knowledge. Secondly, using the structured knowledge, we (1) design a workload-aware and training-free knob selection strategy, (2) develop a search space optimization technique considering the value range of each knob, and (3) propose a Coarse-to-Fine Bayesian Optimization Framework to explore the optimized space. Finally, we evaluate GPTuner under different benchmarks (TPC-C and TPC-H), metrics (throughput and latency) as well as DBMS (PostgreSQL and MySQL). Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, GPTuner identifies better configurations in 16x less time on average. Moreover, GPTuner achieves up to 30% performance improvement (higher throughput or lower latency) over the best-performing alternative.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LIMAO: A Framework for Lifelong Modular Learned Query Optimization

    cs.DB 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A modular lifelong-learning wrapper for learned cost prediction that reduces catastrophic forgetting and improves execution-time stability under dynamic workloads.

  2. MCTuner: Spatial Decomposition-Enhanced Database Tuning via LLM-Guided Exploration

    cs.DB 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    MCTuner reports up to 19.2% performance gains and roughly 1.4x faster discovery of good configurations by combining LLM knob selection with recursive space decomposition and Bayesian optimization.

  3. SEFRQO: A Self-Evolving Fine-Tuned RAG-Based Query Optimizer

    cs.DB 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SEFRQO claims a self-evolving fine-tuned LLM with retrieval and execution feedback reduces query latency versus PostgreSQL, but the provided body is a different paper, blocking verification.

Pith tools