Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generalized parity-oblivious communication games powered by quantum preparation contextuality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.04490 v1 pith:PJ4ZB4JM submitted 2023-11-08 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords preparationcommunicationgamesmodelparity-obliviousporacalicegeneralized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The parity-oblivious random-access-code (PORAC) is a class of communication games involving a sender (Alice) and a receiver (Bob). In such games, Alice's amount of communication to Bob is constraint by the parity-oblivious (PO) conditions, so that the parity information of her inputs remains oblivious to Bob. The PO condition in an operational theory is equivalently represented in an ontological model that satisfies the preparation noncontextuality. In this paper, we provide a nontrivial generalization of the existing two-level PORAC and derive the winning probability of the game in the preparation noncontextual ontological model. We demonstrate that the quantum theory outperforms the preparation noncontextual model by predicting higher winning probability in our generalized PORAC.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unbounded entanglement-sustaining sequential local quantum state discrimination

    quant-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors claim an LOCC protocol distinguishes any two orthogonal entangled two-qubit states sequentially with success >1/2 per round while preserving finite entanglement, but the general-case proof uses a false equality.

Pith tools