Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Chain of Thought with Explicit Evidence Reasoning for Few-shot Relation Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.05922 v3 pith:RARVG6BK submitted 2023-11-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords extractionrelationtrainingapproachchain-of-thoughtcot-erevidencefew-shot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Few-shot relation extraction involves identifying the type of relationship between two specific entities within a text, using a limited number of annotated samples. A variety of solutions to this problem have emerged by applying meta-learning and neural graph techniques which typically necessitate a training process for adaptation. Recently, the strategy of in-context learning has been demonstrating notable results without the need of training. Few studies have already utilized in-context learning for zero-shot information extraction. Unfortunately, the evidence for inference is either not considered or implicitly modeled during the construction of chain-of-thought prompts. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for few-shot relation extraction using large language models, named CoT-ER, chain-of-thought with explicit evidence reasoning. In particular, CoT-ER first induces large language models to generate evidences using task-specific and concept-level knowledge. Then these evidences are explicitly incorporated into chain-of-thought prompting for relation extraction. Experimental results demonstrate that our CoT-ER approach (with 0% training data) achieves competitive performance compared to the fully-supervised (with 100% training data) state-of-the-art approach on the FewRel1.0 and FewRel2.0 datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Automatic Term Extraction with Large Language Models via Syntactic Retrieval

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Syntactic similarity retrieval of demonstrations improves LLM-based automatic term extraction in cross-domain settings, but gains are modest and in-domain lexical retrieval is often competitive or better.

  2. GroupRAG: Cognitively Inspired Group-Aware Retrieval and Reasoning via Knowledge-Driven Problem Structuring

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Structuring questions into knowledge-driven keypoint groups before retrieval and reasoning improves small-model accuracy on MedQA.

  3. Error-Aware Curriculum Learning for Biomedical Relation Classification

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A teacher-student pipeline in which GPT-4o diagnoses a student's errors, assigns difficulty scores, and generates remediations, then trains a smaller model by curriculum learning, reports new state-of-the-art F1 on fo...

Pith tools