Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How Well Do Large Language Models Understand Syntax? An Evaluation by Asking Natural Language Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08287 v1 pith:4WA5YK2C submitted 2023-11-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmslanguagecomprehensionknowledgesyntacticquestionstraininglarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) bring us closer to achieving artificial general intelligence, the question persists: Do LLMs truly understand language, or do they merely mimic comprehension through pattern recognition? This study seeks to explore this question through the lens of syntax, a crucial component of sentence comprehension. Adopting a natural language question-answering (Q&A) scheme, we craft questions targeting nine syntactic knowledge points that are most closely related to sentence comprehension. Experiments conducted on 24 LLMs suggest that most have a limited grasp of syntactic knowledge, exhibiting notable discrepancies across different syntactic knowledge points. In particular, questions involving prepositional phrase attachment pose the greatest challenge, whereas those concerning adjectival modifier and indirect object are relatively easier for LLMs to handle. Furthermore, a case study on the training dynamics of the LLMs reveals that the majority of syntactic knowledge is learned during the initial stages of training, hinting that simply increasing the number of training tokens may not be the `silver bullet' for improving the comprehension ability of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 337 articles shows Transformers handle formal syntax well but perform worse and more variably at the syntax-semantics interface, with the field over-reliant on English and BERT.

Pith tools