Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08718 v2 pith:QJGWLE4L submitted 2023-11-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords uncertaintyinputaleatoricclarificationdatadecompositionensemblinglanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty decomposition refers to the task of decomposing the total uncertainty of a predictive model into aleatoric (data) uncertainty, resulting from inherent randomness in the data-generating process, and epistemic (model) uncertainty, resulting from missing information in the model's training data. In large language models (LLMs) specifically, identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability, but remains an important open research question. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling, which can be applied to any pre-trained LLM. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions. We show that, when aleatoric uncertainty arises from ambiguity or under-specification in LLM inputs, this approach makes it possible to factor an (unclarified) LLM's predictions into separate aleatoric and epistemic terms, using a decomposition similar to the one employed by Bayesian neural networks. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that input clarification ensembling provides accurate and reliable uncertainty quantification on several language processing tasks. Code and data are available at https://github.com/UCSB-NLP-Chang/llm_uncertainty.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. U-Lens: Supporting User Uncertainty Management in Long-Form LLM Responses

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    U-Lens organizes long-form LLM uncertainty into prioritized multi-granular targets with evaluative explanations and response guidance, improving limited-budget verification over a confidence-cue baseline.

  2. Maximizing Confidence Alone Improves Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reinforcement learning with a reward equal to the negative entropy of the model's own token distribution improves benchmark accuracy without any labeled answers.

  3. ChemAU: Harness the Reasoning of LLMs in Chemical Research with Adaptive Uncertainty Estimation

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    ChemAU adds a position penalty to token-level uncertainty estimates so that flagged reasoning steps are corrected by a fine-tuned chemistry model, reporting improved accuracy on GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and SuperGPQA chemistry...

Pith tools