Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Thread of Thought Unraveling Chaotic Contexts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08734 v1 pith:IKTWSIF5 submitted 2023-11-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords chaoticcontextsthotcontextlanguagellmspromptingresponse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have ushered in a transformative era in the field of natural language processing, excelling in tasks related to text comprehension and generation. Nevertheless, they encounter difficulties when confronted with chaotic contexts (e.g., distractors rather than long irrelevant context), leading to the inadvertent omission of certain details within the chaotic context. In response to these challenges, we introduce the "Thread of Thought" (ThoT) strategy, which draws inspiration from human cognitive processes. ThoT systematically segments and analyzes extended contexts while adeptly selecting pertinent information. This strategy serves as a versatile "plug-and-play" module, seamlessly integrating with various LLMs and prompting techniques. In the experiments, we utilize the PopQA and EntityQ datasets, as well as a Multi-Turn Conversation Response dataset (MTCR) we collected, to illustrate that ThoT significantly improves reasoning performance compared to other prompting techniques.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Concretized Proposition Prompting Resolves Composition-Knowledge Dichotomy in Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CPP improves LLM QA by generating TP/TN/FP/FN propositions then answering with CoT, outperforming many prompting baselines on medical and commonsense benchmarks.

  2. DocRefine: An Intelligent Framework for Scientific Document Understanding and Content Optimization based on Multimodal Large Model Agents

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-agent GPT-4o framework for editing scientific PDFs reports higher semantic consistency, layout fidelity, and instruction adherence than three baselines on DocEditBench.

  3. LVLM-Composer's Explicit Planning for Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An image generation model that explicitly plans objects, attributes, locations, and relations before synthesizing the image, with reported gains on LongBench-T2I that cannot be verified from the paper.

  4. Leveraging Vision-Language Large Models for Interpretable Video Action Recognition with Semantic Tokenization

    cs.CV 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    LVLM-VAR transforms video into 'semantic action tokens' and uses a LoRA-tuned vision-language model to classify actions and generate explanations, reporting 94.1% on NTU RGB+D X-Sub.

Pith tools